Peer Review History: Investigating the Feasibility and Risks of Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Open Source Intelligence to Manage Predictive Cyber Threat Models

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sindu Padmanabhan, Australia.

(2) Yeshwanth Vasa, USA.

(3) Haritha Rajeev, Bharata Mata College, India.

(4) Akinbusola Olushola, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sindu Padmanabhan, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yeshwanth Vasa, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Haritha Rajeev, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Akinbusola Olushola, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Water Limitation on Gynura procumbens Growth and Phytochemıcal Content

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Montadher Ali Mahdi, Leading National Center For Cancer Research/Univercity Of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Anindita Deb Pal, J.D. Birla Institute, Jadavpur University,  India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Montadher Ali Mahdi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anindita Deb Pal, Indiay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Risk Factors for Mortality in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study from the Republic of Guinea

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Israa Faeck Jaafar, Al-esraa University College, Iraq.

(2) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Shehzad Khan, Saidu Teaching hospital, Pakistan.

(2) Tajamul Hussain Shah, India.

(3) Anuradha, PCTE Group of Institutes, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shehzad Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tajamul Hussain Shah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anuradha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Affordable Ceramic Microfiltration Membrane Using Rice Husk as a Pore Former for Brewery Water Treatment

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Elif Godekmerdan, Ege University, Turkey.

(2) Khaoula Hidouri, University of Gabes, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elif Godekmerdan, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khaoula Hidouri, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of New Molecules of Herbicide on Weed Infestation, Growth and Yield of Kharif Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aashish Gyawali, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Nepal.

(2) Sivanantha J, Vasantham Agricultural Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aashish Gyawali, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sivanantha J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Organic Seed Production Technique with Different Date of Sowing in Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Zaheen Hasan, M.L.K.(P.G.) College, India.

(2) Redwanul Islam, Bangladesh.

(3) Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Soil, Water and Environmental Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.03/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zaheen Hasan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Redwanul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path Analysis in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes for Yield and its Attributing Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Andrzej Kowalski, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Naqib Ullah Khan, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Aksyonov Igor Victorovich, Dmytro Motornyi Tavria State Agrotechnological University, Ukraine.

(3) Kushanova Rystay Zharmagalievna, Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Production, Kazakhstan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naqib Ullah Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aksyonov Igor Victorovich, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kushanova Rystay Zharmagalievna, Kazakhstan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Principal Component Analysis of 100 Indigenous & Exotic Accessions of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] of Indian National Seed Bank

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rizk Salah Hassanin Aly Mohra, Agricultural Research Centre, Field Crops Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Boulgheb Abdelmadjid, Ahmed Draya African University of Adrar, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rizk Salah Hassanin Aly Mohra, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Boulgheb Abdelmadjid, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bayesian Analysis of the Loai Distribution with Conjugate Priors: Methodology and Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Oladapo Muyiwa Oladoja, Abiola Ajimobi Technical University, Nigeria.

(2) Oladimeji Damilare Matthew, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(3) E. I. Abdul Sathar, University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oladapo Muyiwa Oladoja, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oladimeji Damilare Matthew, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (E. I. Abdul Sathar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy and Safety of Labor Induction by Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veeramuthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Poojan Dogra Marwaha, AIIMS, India.

(2) Shivani Singh, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Biju S., Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Poojan Dogra Marwaha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivani Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Biju S., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA