Peer Review History: Comparative Study between the Efficacy of Oral Gemifloxacin and Intravenous Cefotaxime in Treatment of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Payala vijayalakshmi, Gitam Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Gitam University, India

Reviewers:

(1) Bruno Stefanello Vizzotto, Centro Universitário Franciscano, Brazil.

(2) Audumbar Digambar Mali, Sahyadri College of Pharmacy Methwade, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aastha Srivastava, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) J Lavanya, KMCH Institute of Health Science and Research, India.

(3) Maria Alves Barbosa, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil.

(4) P N Panigrahi, India.

(5) Raja Aijaz Ahmad, Sher-E-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bruno Stefanello Vizzotto, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Audumbar Digambar Mali, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Neonatal Jaundice: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice among Pregnant Women Attending the Antenatal Clinic of Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Magesa, Welwitchia University, Namibia.

(2) Cilmara Cristina Alves Da Costa Levy, Faculdade De Ciências Médicas Da Santa Casa De São Paulo, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jong Hwa Yum, Dong-Eui University, South Korea.

(2) Muhammad Shakur ABUBAKAR, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(3) Nawa Raj Subba, Purbanchal University, Edenburgh International College, Nepal.

(4) Rakesh kotha, India.

(5) Sangita Arun Shelar, Smt. Sindhutai Eknathrao Vikhe Patil College of Nursing, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(6) Satish Kumar Pathak, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(7) Shamala Moodley, Mangosuthu University of Technology, South Africa.

(8) Volkan YILMAZ, University of Kafkas, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Emmanuel Magesa, Namibia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Cilmara Cristina Alves Da Costa Levy, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Assessing Tomato Marketing Efficiency in Selected Agro-Ecological Zones of Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Yaseen, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Wardis Girsang, University of Pattimura, Indonesia.

(2) Elena  Nikolova-Kostadinova, University of Agribusiness and Rural Development, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Wardis Girsang, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Elena  Nikolova-Kostadinova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Pre- and Post-harvest Salicylic Acid Application Improves Plant Growth, Fruit Quality and Storability of Pear- A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Professor, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) S. D. Dubey, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, India

(2) Umar Ja’afar, Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria

(3) Swapnil Pandey, Punjab Agricultural University, India

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Phonglosa, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Anna Nowembabazi, Bioversity International, Uganda.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.667/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. D. Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Umar Ja’afar, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Swapnil Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Covid-19 Pandemic and the Informal Sector in Nigeria: Implications for Sustainable SMEs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ivan Markovic, University of Nis, Serbia.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Anak Agung Gde Satia Utama, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.

(2) Elói Martins Senhoras, Federal University of Roraima (UFRR), Brazil.

(3) Akash Kumar Singh, Gandhi Faiz-E-Aam College & Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Brahami  Menaouer, National Polytechnic School of Oran, Algeria.

(2) Christiana Twi-Brempong, Ghana.

(3) Espiritu Martinez Antony Paul, National Autonomous High Andean University, Perú.

(4) Harcharanjit Singh, University Tecjnology Malaysia, Malaysia.

(5) Joyjit Sanyal, Assam University, India.

(6) Karteek Madapana, Giet University, India.

(7) Khaira Amalia Fachrudin, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

(8) Nisha Solanki, SGT University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anak Agung Gde Satia Utama, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Elói Martins Senhoras, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Akash Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Female Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence of Family Firm in Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Adamu Danlami Ahmed, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

(2) Safdar Husain Tahir, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Adamu Danlami Ahmed, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Safdar Husain Tahir, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Importance of Human Milk for Health and as Antiviral Immunotherapy – A Narrative Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, Assistance Profressor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA

(2) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

(3) Dr. Masahiro Hasegawa, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hossein Esmaeilzadeh, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran

(2) Maria Cristina Gonzalez-Torres, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico.

(3) Pasqua Anna Quitadamo, Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, Italy.

(4) Mohamed El-Loly, National Research Centre (NRC), Egypt.

(5) Sangeeta Gehlot, Banaras Hindu University, India

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alaaeldeen Balal Ahmed, Omdurman Islamic University, Sudan.

(2) Isa Swadi Touhali, Wasit University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hossein Esmaeilzadeh, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maria Cristina Gonzalez-Torres, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Pasqua Anna Quitadamo, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Mohamed El-Loly, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Sangeeta Gehlot, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Critical Success Factors of Online Shopping: Rural Perscpective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ivan Markovic, University of Nis, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) L.Sankari, Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts & Science for Women (Bharathiar University), India.

(2) Wilnei Aldir Schneider, Federal University of Amazonas, Brazil.

(3) Akaileh Mustafa, Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gu Shengyu, Huizhou University, China.

(2) Ines Soltani, Sousse University, Tunisia.

(3) Nia Budi Puspitasari, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

(4) Ögretim Üyesi, Turkey.

(5) Satnam Ubeja, Prestige Institute of Management and Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (L.Sankari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wilnei Aldir Schneider, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Akaileh Mustafa, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA