Peer Review History: Case Report on Bipolar Affecting Disorder with Hypertension

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Tsatsaris Athanasios, Greece.

(2) Aashal Bhavesh Shah, Veer Narmad, India.

(3) V. S. Gallicchio, Clemson University, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tsatsaris Athanasios, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aashal Bhavesh Shah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (V. S. Gallicchio, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Obesity-pregnancy and Associated Risk Factors- A Cross Sectional Study in Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkat Ali Khan, Department of Pharmaceutics, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Harun Egemen Tolunay, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women Health Research Hospital, Turkey.

(2) Vidhi Rawat, IES Collage of Technology, India

 

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Harun Egemen Tolunay, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vidhi Rawat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Parasitic Contamination of Fresh Bitter Leaf Vegetables – Onugbu (Vernonia amygdalina): A Case Study of Farms in Nimo, Njikoka Local Government Area, Anambra State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Hana Catur Wahyuni, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia.

(2) Meeta Jain, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adepoju (ogunkunle) Francis Adegbola, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(2) Olubukola Olusola-Makinde, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(3) Ho Le Quynh Chau, Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Vietnam.

(4) Wafaa Mohamed Hikal, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hana Catur Wahyuni, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Meeta Jain, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Antibiogram of Multidrug Resistant Klebsiella Species

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Arun Singh, Rohilkhand Medical College & Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Abduljabbar Jaloob Aljanaby, University of kufa, Iraq.

(2) Jussara Kasuko Palmeiro, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

(3) Made Sudiana, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Basam Basim Mohammed,  Al-Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(2) Diepreye Ere, Niger Delta University, Nigeria.

(3) J.Vimala Vinnarasi, M.V.Muthiah Govt Arts College for Women Dindigul, India.

(4) Louie Mar A. Gangcuangco, Griffin Hospital, USA.

(5) Mahmud Yerima Iliyasu, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Nigeria.

(6) Moumita Sardar, FMHS, SGT University, India.

(7) Mümtaz Güran, Eastern Mediterranean University, Turkey.

(8) Nagham Mohammed Al-Gburi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(9) Nilesh Mandloi, Rajiv Gandhi  Proudhyogiki  Vishwavidhyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ahmed Abduljabbar Jaloob Aljanaby, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jussara Kasuko Palmeiro, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Made Sudiana, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Delta Fixation for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: Technique, Indications and an Adult Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor,Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Gregory M. Malham, Swinburne Institute of Technology, Australia.

(2) Leticia Cuellar-Pompa, Instituto de Investigación en Cuidados del Colegio Oficial de Enfermeros de Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

(3) Tejas  Patil, Maharashtra University Of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Leticia Cuellar-Pompa, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tejas  Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Gregory M. Malham, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Study on Branching Pattern of Branches of Middle Meningeal Artery Based on Meningeal Grooves Present in the Cranial Cavity in South Indian Dry Skulls

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Borgognone Alessandro, CTO Hospital, Italy.

(2) Sidra Ajmal, University of Oklahoma, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Harun Achmad, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Borgognone Alessandro, Italy) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sidra Ajmal, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Comparison of Conventional and Microwave Bone Decalcification Methods by Using 10% Nitric Acid: A Research Protocol

Editor(s):

(1)Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Danilo Oliveira Santos, Abdias Bezerra Center of Excellence, Brazil.

(2) Marsen Garcia Pinto Coelho, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wael Amin Nasr El-Din, Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Danilo Oliveira Santos, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Marsen Garcia Pinto Coelho, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Osteometric Measures of Mandible on Its Various Aspects in South Indian Dry Skull

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjeev V Jakati, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Safae El Abkari, Mohamed V University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Riccardo Beltrami, University of Pavia, Italy.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sanjeev V Jakati, India) | File 1 |NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Safae El Abkari, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Prevalence of Oral Carcinoma among Younger Individuals – A Cross Sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giulio Tarro, Professor & President, Foundation T. & L. de Beaumont Bonelli for cancer Research, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Marion Strub, University of Strasbourg, France.

(2)Sowmya.S, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marion Strub, France) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sowmya.S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Survey on the Problems Faced by Patients Undergoing Dental Implants during Coronavirus Pandemic

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Institute of Mental Health,National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan.

(2) Dr. Begum Rokeya, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Leoney, Goverenment Dental College And Hospital Gujarat, India.

(2) Mohammad Esmaeelinejadf, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) R. Ajay, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, The TN Dr. MGR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Kumar, Surendera Dental College & Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Leoney, India) | File 1 |NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Esmaeelinejadf, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 |Peer review report_3 (R. Ajay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA