Peer Review History: Foot Print Analysis and Prevalence of Flat Foot among Children of Rural India – A Study Protocol

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  John Yahya I. Elshimali, Professor, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California,  USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amrish Chanana, CBPACS, India.

(2) Rabbi Kharbuja, Lumbini Medical College, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayşe Gül Kabakcı, Cukurova University, Turkey.

(2) Sarajko Baksa, Polytechnic of Međimurje in Čakovec, Croatia.

(3) Selma Solgun Dağ, Inönu University, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amrish Chanana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rabbi Kharbuja, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Utilization and Limitations of the Shock Index in the Emergency Settings

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dharmesh Chandra Sharma, ABTO ( Associate Blood Transfusion Officer), Incharge Blood Bank, Component & Aphaeresis Uni, G. R. Medical College & J. A. Hospital, Gwalior India.

Reviewers:

(1) Thiago Victorino Claus, University Hospital of Santa Maria (HUSM) And Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Brazil.

(2) Mariyah Hidayat, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Julita Chideme Maradzika, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe.

(2) Syed Naveed, Baqai Medical Unuversity, Pakistan.

(3) Vaidya Balendu Prakash, VCPC Research Foundation, India.

(4) Malkhaz Makashvili, Ilia State University, Georgia.

(5) Mulugeta Berhanu Feyisa, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Thiago Victorino Claus, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mariyah Hidayat, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Cognitive Impairment within Patients of Schizophrenia and Mood Disorder: A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia,  Perugia,  Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tsvetan Trichkov, Military Medical Academy, Bulgaria.

(2) Thammanard Charernboon, Thammasat University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tsvetan Trichkov, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Thammanard Charernboon, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Comparative Study of Drug Likeness and Pharmacokinetic Properties of Synthetic Antiviral Drugs to that of Remdesivir: In-silico Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

(2) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Fahad Khan, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, India.

(2) Gongsheng Yuan, University of Pennsylvania, US.

(3) Archisman Mahapatra, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(4) Gabi Drochioiu, Al. I. Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fahad Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gongsheng Yuan, US) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Archisman Mahapatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Gabi Drochioiu, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Radiological and Laboratory Modalities for Diagnosis of COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

(2) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Universidad de Guadalajara, México.

(2) José López Castro, SERGAS, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (José López Castro, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Video Assisted Teaching [VAT] in Terms of Knowledge and Self-expressed Stigma Regarding COVID-19 and its Preventive Measures among Housekeeping Staff at Selected Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana: A Pre-experimental Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

(2) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan,  Iran.

(3) Dr. Ali Nokhodchi, Professor, University of Sussex, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Adel Dawood, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Mohamed Mousa Abd El-Mawgod, Al-Azhar University-Faculty of Medicine –Assiut, Egypt.

(3) Marina Vaidya Shrestha, Kathmandu medical College, Kathmandu University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ali Adel Dawood, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohamed Mousa Abd El-Mawgod, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Marina Vaidya Shrestha, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Review of Challenges in Performing RT- PCR for COVID-19 in Rural Healthcare Settings

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

(2) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, Clinical Immunology Unit, University of Genoa, Italy.

(3) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahmoud M. Tawfick, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

(2) Iyevhobu Kenneth Oshiokhayamhe, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(3) Mahmoud M. A. Moustafa, Benha University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar Verma, UP University of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Huda Sahib Abdul-Mohammed, College of Medicine , University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mahmoud M. Tawfick, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Iyevhobu Kenneth Oshiokhayamhe, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mahmoud M. A. Moustafa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Ameliorative Effect of Cannabidiol against Gastric Ulcer Induced by Diclofenac in Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dharmesh Chandra Sharma, ABTO ( Associate Blood Transfusion Officer), Incharge Blood Bank, Component & Aphaeresis Uni, R. Medical College & J. A. Hospital, Gwalior India.

Reviewers:

(1) Clement Kabakama, Muhimbili University Of Health And Allied Sciences, Tanzania

(2) Mohd Farriz Bin Hj Md Basar, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Clement Kabakama, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohd Farriz Bin Hj Md Basar, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Management of Hypertension through Shodhana & Shamana Chikitsa: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Professor, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Jongwha Chang, University of Texas, College of Pharmacy, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Priti  Desai, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences ( Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Gustav Oscar Dumke, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Santa Catarina – Joinville campus, Brazil.

(3) Farhad Abbasi, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Russany Silva da Costa, University of Federal of Pará, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Priti  Desai, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gustav Oscar Dumke, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Farhad Abbasi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Gestational Diabetes as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disorders

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant professor, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nanu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ningthoujam Dinita Devi, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Ankan Kumar Paul, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Djefaflia Rabiaa, Scientific and Technical Research Center in Physicochemical Analysis (CRAPC), Algeria.

(2) Manu Pradeep, Rajagiri Hospital, India.

(3) Pooja Nitin Joshi, B. J. Govt. Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ningthoujam Dinita Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ankan Kumar Paul, UK) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA