Peer Review History: Necessity of Structured Exercise Training Program and Its Feasability on Physical Capacity and Health Statuswith Post COVID-19 Syndrome Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, Professor, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

(2) Dr. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University Iztapalapa Campus Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186 México City 09340 México.

Reviewers:

(1) Binoy Mathew K V, India.

(2) Ashika G. Tanna, Shiv Hospital – Center of Orthopaedic superspeciality and Trauma, India.

(3) Nizar Abdul Majeed Kutty, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Binoy Mathew K V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ashika G. Tanna, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nizar Abdul Majeed Kutty, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Physiotherapy Rehabilitation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Patient- A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Cătălin Păunescu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Sibasish Sasmal, Midnapore Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Cătălin Păunescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sibasish Sasmal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: The Outpatient Prescribing Pattern of Topical Lidocaine in Al Seih

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rasim Mogulkoc, Selcuk University, Turkey.

(2) Hirbo Samuel, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hina Niraj Gadani, Gmers Medical College, India.

(2) Khalid Siddiqui, Aga Khan University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rasim Mogulkoc, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hirbo Samuel, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Quantification and Stability Indicating Method Development and Validation of Vismodegib in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R. Deveswaran, Associate Professor & Head, Drug Design and Development Centre, M.S.Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Murali Dadi, Copperbelt University, Zambia.

(2) D. Sireesha, Anurag University, India.

(3) Sathish Kumar Konidala, Vignan’s Foundation for Science Technology and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jahnavi Bandla, Vishnu Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, India.

(2) S Kathirvel, National College Of Pharmacy, Kerala.

(3) Sushil Dagadu Patil, Kalyani Charitable Trust, R.G. Sapkal College of Pharmacy, Sapkal Knowledge Hub, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(4) Mahesh.M, Jnt University Anantapur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Murali Dadi, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (D. Sireesha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sathish Kumar Konidala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Rehabilitation of a Patient with Wedge Compression with Paraplegia: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. SAWADOGO Wamtinga Richard, Ministry of higher education, scientific research and innovation, Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Neydi Osnaya Romero, Instituto Nacional De Pediatria, Mexico.

(2) Necati Ucler, Adiyaman University, Turkey.

(3) Santoshi Ram Ghodake, SMBT Dental College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Neydi Osnaya Romero, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Necati Ucler, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Santoshi Ram Ghodake, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Developmental Coordination Disorder, Impact of Fine Motor Skills on Handwriting and Academic Performance in School Going Children: A Research Protocol

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  John Yahya I. Elshimali, Professor, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Orlando J. Castejón, Neuroscience Clinical Institute and Biological Research Institute, Zulia University, Venezuela.

(2) Mostafa Daemi, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Orlando J. Castejón, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mostafa Daemi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Mebeverine Prescribing in the Outpatient Setting in Riyadh Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Alan Kelbis Oliveira Lima, University of Brasília, Brazil.

(2) Ashraf ALakkad, Madinat Zayed Hospital, United Arab Emirates.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhay Maurya, Mizoram University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alan Kelbis Oliveira Lima, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ashraf ALakkad, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Prevention of the Development of Chronic Diseases in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

(2) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Omaima Mohamed Elalem, Port Said University, Egypt.

(2) Md Abdur Razzak, Delaware Biotechnology institute, University of Delaware, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Omaima Mohamed Elalem, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Md Abdur Razzak, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: The Outpatient Use of Ascorbic Acid in a Public Healthcare Organization in Riyadh Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor,  Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahoor Ahmad Sajid, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

(2) Naga Ravi Kiran Tangirala, Narasaraopeta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Maruti Shendurse, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Ifora ifora, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Zahoor Ahmad Sajid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Naga Ravi Kiran Tangirala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Awareness of Parents Regarding DKA Symptoms in their Children with Type I DM

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Koteshwara Mudigonda, Director of Novel Drug Delivery Systems Propharmex Company, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Joan-Antoni Valles, UdG, Spain.

(2) Akanksha Tomar, NSCB Medical College Jabalpur, India.

(3) Takahiko Nagamine, Sunlight Brain Research Center, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dominic Worku, United Kingdom.

(2) Dharmendra Panchal, Gujarat University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Joan-Antoni Valles, Spain) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Akanksha Tomar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Takahiko Nagamine, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA