Peer Review History: Maxillary Rehabilitation with Combined Fixed-Removable Prosthesis Using Extra Coronal Semi Precision Attachment: Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ketij Mehulic, University of Zagreb, Hospital Center Zagreb, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Anu Jose, Annoor Dental College And Hospital, Muvattupuzha, India.

(2) Sandeep Singh, Post Graduate Institute Of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anu Jose, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sandeep Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Evaluation of Efficacy of Phalatrikadi Ghan Vati in Patients of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease through Reverse Pharmacology Approach – Study Protocol

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Department of Natural Sciences, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharatkumar Padhar, National Institute of Ayurveda, India.

(2) Kanchan Borkar, S. V. N. H. T Ayurveda College, India.

(3) Deodatta Bhadlikar Mamch, India.

(4) B. Premkumar, K.K.College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Najmus Sehar, Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine, India.

(2) Rakesh Kumar Joshi, India.

(3) Ankur Kumar Tanwar, University of Delhi, India.

(4) Chee Ping Fadzel Wong, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.

(5) Dilip Kr. Goswami, Srimanta Sankaradeva University of Health Sciences, India.

(6) Justin R Nayagam, Union Christian College, India.

(7) Pradeep K, Govt Ayurveda College, India.

(8) Somenath Ghosh, Rajendra College, Jai Prakash University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bharatkumar Padhar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kanchan Borkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Deodatta Bhadlikar Mamch, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (B. Premkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Case Report On: Complete Heart Block

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Begum Rokeya, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Larisa Anghel, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Santhi Silambanan, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rajan Anand, Sri Satya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Larisa Anghel, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Santhi Silambanan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Review on SLN and NLC for Management of Fungal Infections

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Van-An Duong, Gachon University, South Korea.

(2) Sabna Kotta, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Van-An Duong, South Korea) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sabna Kotta, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Analysis of Histological Features of the Cerebral Cortex and Hippocampus of Albino Rats Using Haematoxylin & Eosin Stain- An Observational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Faheem, Riphah International University, Pakistan.

(2) K. Hema Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. P. Angeline Kirubha, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Muhammad Faheem, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (K. Hema Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: An Evaluation of Stress Induced by Neet Coaching among School Children

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Nova Southeastern University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bogdan Alexandru, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

(2) Leili mohammadi, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bogdan Alexandru, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Leili mohammadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Application of E-Pharmacies in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

(2) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Neelam Sanjeev Kumar, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

(2) Vahid Mohamad Taghvaee, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.

(3) Eddy Winarso, Jenderal Achmad Yani University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Samara Mubeen, Visvesvaraya Technological University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Neelam Sanjeev Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vahid Mohamad Taghvaee, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Eddy Winarso, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Overview on Causes, Diagnosis and Management of Knee Injuries in Children and Adolescents: Review Article

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tan Xiao Jian, Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Malaysia.

(2) El Amrani Souad, University Hassa II – Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anthony Ike Wegbom, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Muhammad Inam, Medical Teaching Institute Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan.

(3) Shashwati Sen, Mohak Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tan Xiao Jian, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (El Amrani Souad, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: To Evaluate Fear and Assess Practice Modification among Dentist against COVID-19 in India – A Questionnaire Based Survey

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(2) Amal Hegazi Ahmed Elrefaei, Hot Lab and Waste Management Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kalaiselvi  Santhosh, M.G.R University, India.

(2) Line Droubi, Dental University, Syria.

(3) Mohannad Laflouf, Damascus University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Beata Śmielak, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kalaiselvi  Santhosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Line Droubi, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mohannad Laflouf, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Relationship of Various Patterns of Quid Usage in Patients with Oral Submucous Fibrosis and Leukoplakia in Central India Population: A Cross Sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giulio Tarro, Foundation T. & L. de Beaumont Bonelli for cancer Research, Napoli, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Susmit Sneha, Noida International Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Sovna Shivani Mishra, Government Dental College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Iman Ismail Dakhli, Cairo University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Susmit Sneha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sovna Shivani Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA