Peer Review History: Effect of Pulsed Electro-Magnetic Field (PEMF) Therapy and Conventional Physiotherapy on Lipid Profile- A Randomised Control Trial

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mira Kalita, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Romina Aspera-Werz, Eberhard Karl University of Tübingen, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mira Kalita, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Romina Aspera-Werz, Germany) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Study on Role of In-patient Pharmacist in Prescribed Drug Handling, Mixing, Infusing and Spillage Handling of Chemotherapeutic Drug-Cisplatin in a Tertiary Hospital Pharmacy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Jampala Rajkumar, Vaageswari College Of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Christina Voycheva, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Suresh Kumar, Kalasalingam Academy Of Research and Education, India.

(2) Antonio F. Caballero-Bermejo, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain.

(3) N.T. Ravindran, Adhiparasakthi College of Arts Andscience (AUTONOMOUS), India.

(4) Andrés Felipe Valencia Quintero, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.75/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jampala Rajkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Christina Voycheva, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Perception of Health Care Worker about Uptake of Influenza Vaccine in COVID-19 Era

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, University of Texas College of Pharmacy, USA.

(2) Dr. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Nova Southeastern University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Stathopoulou G. Harikleia, Tzaneio General Hospital Of Piraeus, Greece & Nursing School Diek Tzaneio, Greece.

(2) Kshama Gupta, R B Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prasanna Venkatesh Ramesh, Mahathma Eye Hospital Private Limited, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Stathopoulou G. Harikleia, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kshama Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: To Assess the Effectiveness of Planned Teaching on Knowledge Regarding Mid-Wife Led Continuity of Care Model (MLCC) on Final Year Nursing Students

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Jhuliano Silva Ramos de Souza, Federal University of Alfenas, Brazil.

(2) Jomin Jose, Witington Community Hospital, United kingdom.

(3) Natasa Pejcic, University of Belgrade, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jhuliano Silva Ramos de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jomin Jose, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Natasa Pejcic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Study on the Identification and Comparison of Functional Components in Different Species of Passion Fruit Vine Leaves

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkat Ali Khan, Gomal University, Pakistan

Reviewers:

(1) Saiful Irwan Zubairi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Malaysia.

(2) Simon Bambang Widjanarko, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia.

 

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Saiful Irwan Zubairi, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Simon Bambang Widjanarko, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Study on the Clinicopathological Profile of the Cases of Colorectal Carcinoma

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Naveenvairamoorthy Dakshinamoorthy, ESI Postgraduate Institute of Medical Science and Research, India.

(2) Mahdi Ali Abdullah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Naveenvairamoorthy Dakshinamoorthy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mahdi Ali Abdullah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Prediction of Epitope Peptides for PTK Gene of Acinetobacter baumannii

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sherein Gamal  Elgendy, Assiut University, Egypt.

(2) Virendra Gomase, Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Uriel Mauricio Valdez Espinoza, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sherein Gamal  Elgendy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Virendra Gomase, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Uriel Mauricio Valdez Espinoza, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Emergency Department Visits and Quality of Service: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in a Tertiary Centre

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giulio Tarro, Professor & President, Foundation T. & L. de Beaumont Bonelli for cancer Research, Italy.

(2) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Singh, Symbiosis International ( Deemed University), India.

(2) Yenew Alemu, Injibara University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Brian Rowe, University of Alberta, Canada.

(2) Sushila Devi Bhandari, NAIHS-College of Nursing, Nepal.

(3) Heru Supriyatno, Health Polytechnic of Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

(4) Ankit Singh, Symbiosis International ( Deemed University) , India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ankit Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yenew Alemu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Anti–Diabetic Activity of Murraya koenigii – A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, College of Pharmacy,Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Bikash Adhikari, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) José D. Méndez, Mexican Institute of Social Security, México.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bikash Adhikari, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (José D. Méndez, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Psychological Stress Due to Covid-19 on Pregnant Women in Post Partal Period

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Nova Southeastern University, USA.

(2) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Eric Li, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

(2) Biplob Kumar Dey, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

(3) Keetam D. F. Alkahtani, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eric Li, Hong Kong) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Biplob Kumar Dey, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Keetam D. F. Alkahtani, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA