Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  John Yahya I. Elshimali, Professor, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of edicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Deac Liana Monica, University Babes- Bolyai Cluj, Romania.

(2) Bin Gao, Tianjin Medical University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Deac Liana Monica, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bin Gao, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aurora Martínez Romero, Professor and Researcher, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Neeraj Kumar Fuloria, AIMST University, Malaysia.

(2) Prawit Nuengmatcha, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Harpreet Kaur, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Murtaza Hasan, The islamia university Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Neeraj Kumar Fuloria, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Prawit Nuengmatcha, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Somdet Srichairatanakool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

(2) Ioannis G Koutelekos, University of West Attica, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Somdet Srichairatanakool, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ioannis G Koutelekos, Greece) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tapan Kumar Sahu, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Naeem Hasan Khan, AIMST University, Malaysia.

(3) Dilfaraz Khan Institute of Chemical Sciences Gomal University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tapan Kumar Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Naeem Hasan Khan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Dilfaraz Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Adefarati Oloruntoba, China University Of Petroleum, China.

(2) S.Priyadharshini, The American College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nagesh N. Malik, Vivekanand Education Society’s College of Arts, Science and Commerce (Former), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Adefarati Oloruntoba, China) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Priyadharshini, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

(2) Dr. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Fowzul Islam Fahad, International Islamic University Of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

(2) Lalaine Grace M. Maghanoy, Central Mindanao University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fowzul Islam Fahad, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lalaine Grace M. Maghanoy, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Bashar H. Malkawi, Practice in Law at the University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Arshad, National College Of Business Administration And Economics, Pakistan.

(2) Martina Blašková, Police Academy Of The Czech Republic, Czech Republic.

(3) George, Nchelem  Rosemary, Ignatius Ajuru University Of Education Rivers State,  Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tulus P Sihaloho, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Medan, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Muhammad Arshad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Martina Blašková, Czech Republic) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (George, Nchelem  Rosemary, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Panagiotis Tsikripis, University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Praveen Kumar Chaturvedi, Centre for Sight, Varanasi, India.

(2) Rusciano Dario, University of Catania, Italy.

(3) Anurag Narula, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Italo Giuffre, Catholic University of Rome, Italy.

(2) Sony Sinha, Patna Medical College Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Praveen Kumar Chaturvedi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rusciano Dario, Italy) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Anurag Narula, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francesco Saverio Sorrentino, Ospedale Maggiore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Suresh Bk Rasaily, Rapti Eye Hospital, Nepal.

(2) Jasmin Ahmad, Institute Of Community Ophthalmology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) İlhan Bahşi, Gaziantep University, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Suresh Bk Rasaily, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jasmin Ahmad, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) M.Devi, D.K.M. College for Women, India.

(2) Etienne Twizeyimana, Kiyumba TVET School, Rwanda.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M.Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Etienne Twizeyimana, Rwanda) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Journal Change| File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA