Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Zagazig University, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Nova Southeastern University, USA.

(3) Dr. Begum Rokeya, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Timothy Omara, Moi University, Kenya.

(2) Tijana Serafimovska, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, North Macedonia.

(3) Prathapkumar Kothapalli, The University of Trans-Disciplinary, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Timothy Omara, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tijana Serafimovska, North Macedonia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Prathapkumar Kothapalli, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Koteshwara Mudigonda, Propharmex Company, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Indah Hartati, Universitas Wahid Hasyim, Indonesia.

(2) Javier  Añorve Morga, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepti Tomar, Govt. Degree College, Nainpur, India.

(2) Hassan A.H. Ibrahim, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt.

(3) Marwa Yassien Badr, Tanta University, Egypt.

(4) Michelle Félix de Andrade, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

(5) Hind Hadi Abdullah, University of Baghdad- College of Science, Iraq.

(6) T Venkatachalam, JKKMMRF ‘s College of Pharmacy, India.

(7) Anselmo Enrique Ferrer Hernandez, Havana University, Cuba.

(8) Kavitha K, Karpagam College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Indah Hartati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Javier  Añorve Morga, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) N. H. Vadia, Saurashtra University, India.

(2) Nagwa Ali Sabri, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (N. H. Vadia, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nagwa Ali Sabri, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anuj Kumar Choudhary, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Syam Sundar Reddy, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anuj Kumar Choudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Syam Sundar Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R. Rajalakshmi, Avinash lingam Institute for Home science and Higher Education for women, India.

(2) Dr. Pinar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Marcela Bianchessi da Cunha Santino, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), Brazil.

(2) Radu Daniela, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marcela Bianchessi da Cunha Santino, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Radu Daniela, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Panagiotis Tsikripis, University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Christian Albrecht, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.

(2) Altaf A. Kondkar, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Seema Dutt Bandhu, Punjab Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Christian Albrecht, Germany) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Altaf A. Kondkar, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkat Ali Khan, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mikaela Clotilde da Silva, State University of Paraíba, Brazil.

(2) Carmen S Horjus, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Netherlands.

(3) Praveen Kumar, Ratnam Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mikaela Clotilde da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Carmen S Horjus, Netherlands) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Praveen Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Zenati Latifa, University of Algiers, Algeria.

(2) Hazim Mohamed Rizk, Mustaqbal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahila, Sri Venkateshwaraa Dental College And Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Zenati Latifa, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hazim Mohamed Rizk, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University Iztapalapa Campus, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Kanedi, University of Lampung (UNILA), Indonesia.

(2) Ana Júlia Pinto Fonseca Sieuve Afonso, Nova University, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohammad Kanedi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ana Júlia Pinto Fonseca Sieuve Afonso, Portugal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Shane McCrea, Kings College London, UK.

(2) Ashok vikey, Madhya Pradesh Medical Science University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shane McCrea, UK) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ashok Vikey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA