Peer Review History: Granisetron Versus Ondansetron for Prevention of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Joe Liu, Michigan State University, USA.

(2) Nazia Nazir, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India.

(3) Anjali R, All India Institute Of Medical Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhawana Rastogi, Subharti Medical College Meerut, India.

(2) Alok Bharti, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Jatinkumar Bipinchandra Modi, Gujarat University, India.

(4) Azarinah Izaham, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.

(5) Nemat Khansari, Medical University of Tehran, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Joe Liu, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nazia Nazir, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Anjali R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Joe Liu, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Nazia Nazir, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Anjali R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Comparative Physiochemical Analysis of Kachi Ghani, Solvent Oil and refined Oil Extracted from Brassica nigra

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Wayan Muderawan, Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia.

(2) Kateryna Semchenko, National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Harun Al Rashid, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Wayan Muderawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kateryna Semchenko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Comparison of Efficacy of the Pap and H & E in Identifying the Various Changes in Liver Samples of High Fat Diet Induced Rat – In vitro Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Christulas Jyoti, GEMS School Of Nursing, India.

(2) R. Murphy, Dublin City University, Ireland.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naqib Rafieqin Noordin, University of Malaya, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Christulas Jyoti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (R. Murphy, Ireland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Alternative Approaches for Rheumatoid Arthritis Management: Future Perspective, Herbal, Dietary, Lifestyle, Psychological, Nutritional Intervention and Healthcare

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, University of Texas, College of Pharmacy, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Presannakumaran P N, Pushpagiri College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Shailendra Singh, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Presannakumaran P N, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shailendra Singh, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Modern Economic Realities, Coronavirus, Vaccination: Interrelation and Challenges to the Future

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

(3) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexandr Ceasovschih, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Yasser Mohammed Hassanain Elsayed, Egypt.

(3) Gloria Cecilia Deossa Restrepo, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia.

(4) Barbara Pinto, Università di Pisa, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alexandr Ceasovschih, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yasser Mohammed Hassanain Elsayed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Gloria Cecilia Deossa Restrepo, Colombia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Barbara Pinto, Italy) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Vegetation Change Detection in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques from 2000 to 2020

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Morakinyo, Barnabas Ojo, Baze University Abuja, Nigeria.

(2) Ramon Francisco Q. Padilla, Mindanao State University at Naawan, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adewuyi, Gbola Kehinde, The Polytechnic Ibadan, Nigeria.

(2) Adegoke Kayode Martins, Federal Polytechnic Mubi, Nigeria.

(3) Zbiri Asmae, University Mohammed V, Morocco.

(4) Onuwa Okwuashi, University Of Uyo, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Morakinyo, Barnabas Ojo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ramon Francisco Q. Padilla, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Application of Game Theory and Markov Chains on English Premier League (EPL) Scorelines Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Junjie Chen, University of Texas at Arlington, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Avadis Simon Hacinliyan, Yeditepe University, Turkey.

(2) Felix O. Socorro M., Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Avadis Simon Hacinliyan, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Felix O. Socorro M, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Determination of Heavy Metals in Soil around Amasoma Community in Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Rehab Mohamed Atta Mahmoud El Desoukey, Shaqraa University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Abdissa Bekele Sima, Mettu University, Ethiopia.

(3) Dorota Porowska, University of Warsaw, Poland.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kiran D A, Siddaganga Institute of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rehab Mohamed Atta Mahmoud El Desoukey, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abdissa Bekele Sima, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Dorota Porowska, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Spectrum of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Drinking and Wastewater in Rafha City of Saudi Arabia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Danny Faturachman, Darma Persada University, Indonesia.

(2) Silvia Giono, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Danny Faturachman, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Silvia Giono, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Effect of Hydrophilic Carriers for Solubility and Dissolution Enhancement of Sulfamerazine by Solid Dispersions Technique

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Dvgowda, JSS Academy Of Higher Education And Research, India.

(2) Krishnaraj, Manipal Academy Of Higher Education, India.

(3) Purnachandra Reddy Guntaka, Gandhi  Institute Of Technology And Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adriana Segall, University of Buenos Aires, Argentine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dvgowda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Krishnaraj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Purnachandra Reddy Guntaka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA