Peer Review History: Determination of Astrocyte Reaction Using Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) Following Aluminium Chloride Induced Hippocampus Damage of Adult Wistar Male Rats Treated with Ethanolic Extracts of Carpolobia lutea at Different Doses

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Suma B V, Assistant Professor, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinícius Benatti Freire, Nove de Julho University, Brazil.

(2) Vinícius Benatti Freire, Nove de Julho University, Brazil.

Ayman M. Ghallab

Zagazig University, British University, Egypt

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinícius Benatti Freire, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayman M. Ghallab, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Applicability of HEC-RAS and Geospatial Tools for Inland Waterways Transportation Corridor: Case Study of Ganga Basin, Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Essam Fathy Mohamed El-Hashash, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Gulap Sonowal, Darrang College, India.

(2) Sawant Sushant Anil, School of Life Sciences, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Veronica Mwikali Kiluva, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gulap Sonowal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sawant Sushant Anil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Predictive Models for Energy Demand and CO2 Emission Trends for Households in Makurdi Metropolis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Research Scientist, Energy and Building Research Center (EBRC), Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Jayakiran Reddy E, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Solomon Nsor-Anabiah, Ghana Communication Technology University, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jayakiran Reddy E, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Solomon Nsor-Anabiah, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physicochemical and Nutritional Evaluation of Mango Purees from the Savanes District under Different Storage Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Cássio Ricardo Gonçalves Da Costa, Federal Rural University of the Semiarid, Brazil.

(2) Ulrich Landry Kamdem Bemmo, Higher Teacher Training College, University of Bertoua, Cameroon.

(3) Prasanna Prakash Bhalerao, School of Engineering, Ajeenkya D. Y. Patil University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil B, Capital Degree and PG College, India.

(2) Ankita Sagar, United University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cássio Ricardo Gonçalves Da Costa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ulrich Landry Kamdem Bemmo, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prasanna Prakash Bhalerao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Edible Coatings on Morphological Characters of Strawberry Fruits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nazimah Maqbool, Retired Professor, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Shiv Kumar Shivandu, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Gopa Sarma, Guru Nanak Khalsa College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ananya Khatun, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University (HSTU), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shiv Kumar Shivandu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gopa Sarma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Tree Geometry on the Growth and Yield Performance of Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.) under Kadam (Neolamarckia cadamba Roxb.) based Agroforestry System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Sateesh Kumar Dhaked, Agriculture University of Kota, India.

(2) Hari Om, BAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sateesh Kumar Dhaked, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hari Om, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances in Triticale (X Triticosecale) Improvement: Chromosome Manipulation and Biotechnological Approaches

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kave Koorehpaz, Urmia University, Iran.

(2) Harshit Saxena, ICAR-IVRI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kave Koorehpaz, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harshit Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of French Bean Genotypes at Late Season Sowing in Sylhet, Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-Sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Salah Ezzat, Minia University, Egypt.

(2) Md. Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Subhash Nanasaheb Varpe, Maulana Azad College of Art Science and Commerce, Dr.Rafiq zakaria campus rauza bagh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asmaa Salah Ezzat, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Perception on Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRS) of Commonly Used Medication among Non-Allied Health Foreign Students in University of Perpetual Help System Dalta, Las Piñas Campus

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sagar Narendra Ande, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.

(2) Nambari Hemanth Kumar, Kalam Institute of HealthTechnology, India.

(3) Virendra Kushwaha, GSVM Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Badar Uddin Umar, CAU, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, Canada.

(2) Deep Inder, Jamia Millia Islamia, India.

(3) Dhanya Dharman, Ezhuthachan College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(4) Susan Anand, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sagar Narendra Ande, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nambari Hemanth Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Virendra Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Post Facial Restructuring Bariatric Surgery: Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barbara Giambene, Al Emadi Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Reviewers:

(1) Pravin Hector John, Anurag Hospital, India.

(2) Aditya Prasad Padhy, KIMS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pravin Hector John, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditya Prasad Padhy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA