Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vlasta Hus, University of Maribor, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ana Purwitasari, University of Freiburg, Indonesia.

(2) Befio Paulin Epaphrodite, University of Bangui, Central African Republic.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ana Purwitasari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Befio Paulin Epaphrodite, Central African Republic) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Bilal Ahmad Lone, Sher-E-Kashmir University Of Agricultural Sciences And Technology Of Jammu, India.

(2) Fernanda Raghiante, Federal Institute Of Education, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Edmund J. Kayombo, Institute of Traditional Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania.

(2) Luiz Carlos Ferreira, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of the Northern Minas Gerais (IFNMG), Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bilal Ahmad Lone, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Fernanda Raghiante, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hung-Jen Liu, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Saurabh Chhotalal Norris, Sumandeep Vidhyapeeth University, India.

(2) Rebah N. Algafari, Nahrain University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Saurabh Chhotalal Norris, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rebah N. Algafari, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mubashir Zafar, University Of Hail, KSA.

(2) Krishna Kumar G, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shruti Rathore, Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanad Technical University, India.

(2) Manisha N Shah, Sarvajanik University, India.

(3) Masroor Jahan, Ranchi Institute of Neuro-Psychiatry and Allied Sciences, India.

(4) Agi Vivian Nkemekanma, Rivers State University Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mubashir Zafar, Ksa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Krishna Kumar G, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ihor Atabiekov, Russia.

(2) Miljana Z Jovandaric, University Clinical Centre Of Serbia, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dasarapu Indrani, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ihor Atabiekov, Russia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Miljana Z Jovandaric, Serbia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Champa Lal Khatik, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

(2) A.Rohini, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Champa Lal Khatik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (A. Rohini, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Derling Mendoza, Peru.

(2) Sanjib Kumar Datta, University Of Kalyani, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anuj Saxena, Sacred Heart Degree College, India.

(2) T.Kongeswaran, Ferhat Abbas University Setif1, Algeria.

(3) Aziz Benhamrouche, Ferhat Abbas University Setif1, Algeria.

(4) Balaji S. Thorat, Dr. Balasheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(5) Gurdeep Singh Malhi, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Derling Mendoza, Peru) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sanjib Kumar Datta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Parth Trivedi, C.M. Patel College of Physiotherapy, Civil Hospital Campus, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Afaf  Taha Ibrahiem, Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Igna Cornel, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine of Banat from Timisoara, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Afaf  Taha Ibrahiem, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Igna Cornel, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Hunan Women’s University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) K.Kannan, SASTRA Deemed to be Univeristy, India.

(2) Ashish Kumar, Agra College, India.

(3) Edmundo G. Moreno, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, Peru.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (K. Kannan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ashish Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Edmundo G. Moreno, Peru) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ian McFarlane, University of Reading, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) Kerketta S, India.

(2) Maryam Afrousheh, Pistachio Research Center Rafsanjan, Iran.

(3) Rasha Nagy Arafa, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Isaiah, Akaninyene Ime, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

(2) Maurice Manyonge Pepela, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kerketta S, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maryam Afrousheh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Rasha Nagy Arafa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA