Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Babak Safaei, Eastern Mediterranean University, Cyprus.

(2) K. Ravikanth, Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Babak Safaei, Cyprus) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (K. Ravikanth, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sailesh Kumar Mukul, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Patna, India.

(2) Sachin S Kadam, Currae Specialty Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Roberto Valdés-Pons, Hospital Ribera Povisa, Spain.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sailesh Kumar Mukul, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sachin S Kadam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India

Reviewers:

(1) Kushagra Joshi, ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, India.

(2) Mubashir Ali Rather, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kushagra Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mubashir Ali Rather, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamran Baseer Achakzai, Pakistan.

(2) Arjun Prasad Khanal, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kamran Baseer Achakzai, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arjun Prasad Khanal, Nepal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Besey Ören, University of Health Sciences, Turkey.

(2) M.Veera Kumari, Dr.NTR University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Besey Ören, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M.Veera Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manish Mahajan, CGC College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Marco Antonio Campos Benvenga, UNIP – Universidade Paulista, Brazil.

(2) Mohammad Khaleel Sallam Ma’aitah, Near East University, Jordan.

(3) Paul  I. Dalatu, Adamawa State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.03/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marco Antonio Campos Benvenga, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Khaleel Sallam Ma’aitah, Jordan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Paul  I. Dalatu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Davina Hijam, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hamed Abdel-Aziz Ali Omer, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

(2) Emmanuel Bukoye Oyewo, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hamed Abdel-Aziz Ali Omer, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Emmanuel Bukoye Oyewo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Emiliana Cristina Melo, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Parana, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed I. Marie, Helwan University, Egypt.

(2) Afsha Jamal, Prince Sattam bIn Abdul Aziz University, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Florentine Paudel, University College of Teacher Education Vienna, Austria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yani Ramdani, Dra, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia.

(2) Terhemba Godwin Atsua, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(3) Ana Isabel Aldazábal Contreras, Universidad Peruana De Ciencias Aplicadas, Perú.

(4) Rasheed Adenrele Adetoro, Federal College of Education Abeokuta, Nigeria.

(5) Diah Royani Meisani, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.

(6) Terhemba Godwin Atsua, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(7) Diah Royani Meisani, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohamed I. Marie, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Afsha Jamal, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Florentine Paudel, Austria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shipra Sonkusare,  K S Hegde Medical Academy, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kateryna Semchenko, National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine.

(2) A M Hoque, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kateryna Semchenko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (A M Hoque, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Bagiu Iulia Cristina, University of Medicine and Pharmacy „Victor Babeş” Timişoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Henrilyn E. Loñez, Kalinga State University, Philippines.

(2) Ola Saleh Mahdi, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kemegne Gislaine Aurelie, Institute of Medical Research and Medicinal Plant Study, Cameroon.

(2) Ho Thi Ngan Ha, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

(3) Tinggui Chen, Shanxi University, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Henrilyn E. Loñez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ola Saleh Mahdi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA