Peer Review History: Optimized hybrid block methods with high efficiency indicies for the solution of first-order ordinary differential equations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Danilo Costarelli, Associate Professor, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Saidu Daudu Yakubu, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Nigeria.

(2) Samuel Adamu, Nigerian Army University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bright O. Osu, Abia State University Uturu, Nigeria.

(2) Bakari, Ibrahim Abba, Federal University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.01/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saidu Daudu Yakubu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel Adamu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AGRONOMIC PRACTICES ADOPTED BY THE MAIZE (Zea mays) FARMERS IN HOROWPATHANA DS DIVISION IN ANURADHAPURA DISTRICT IN SRI LANKA: A CASE STUDY

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Cengiz Yucedag, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey.

(2) Prof. Nebi Bilir, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Kandel, Agriculture and Forestry University, Nepal.

(2) Theodor Friedrich, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Samwel P. Lunyelele, The Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy, United Republic of Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pradeep Kandel, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Theodor Friedrich, Germany) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Community Perceptions of Speeding and Road Safety in Agona Swedru, Ghana: Insights for Evidence-Based Policy and Practice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veeramuthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) M S Saran, KSCSTE, NATPAC, India.

(2) Dina Lusiana Setyowati, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(3) Saagar Singh, Ram Krishna Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M S Saran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dina Lusiana Setyowati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saagar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Analysis of Migration during Covid-19 Pandemic

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aditi R Khandelwal, Associate Professor, IIS (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

(3) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Arbind Chaudhary, Nepal.

(2) Samit Mahore, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, India.

(3) Anuja Sharma, Amity University, India.

(4) Arup Mitra, South Asian University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arbind Chaudhary, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samit Mahore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anuja Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arup Mitra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Combined use of Nutrition and Weed Management Practices on the Weed Studies, Seed Yield and Microbial Counts of Soil in Blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Laleh Naraghi, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Rohitashv Nagar, Career Point University, India.

(2) Amit A. Shahane, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ekaterina Ivanova, Russia.

(2) Ekeoma Onuoha, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(3) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rohitashv Nagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit A. Shahane, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: SOLAR COOKER, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND PERFORMANCE.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chong Leong, Gan, Director, Micron Technology Inc., Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dinesh Acharya, Shandong University, china, And Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Bhise Ramesh B, S. P. Pune University, India.

(3) Yettou Fatiha, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dinesh Acharya, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhise Ramesh B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yettou Fatiha, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Giant Keratocanthoma Centrifugum Marginatum: A typical presentation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Som Subhro Biswas, Radiologist, Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Centre, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Prasanna, Seema Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) Madhumita Mukhopadhyay, Diamond Harbour Government Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Felix Edoiseh,  Ehidiamhen, David Umahi Federal University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Prasanna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhumita Mukhopadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Arima-Based Forecasting of Poultry Egg and Meat Prices in Key Markets of Karnataka

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Robert Kosova, University “Aleksander Moisiu” Durres, Albania.

(2) Sudha K, Velammal Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ansuman Satapathy, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Robert Kosova, Albania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudha K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA