Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Marija Sholjakova, University “Ss, Cyril and Methodius”, North Macedonia.

(2) Nemat Khansari, School of Medicine, Medical University of Tehran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marija Sholjakova, North Macedonia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nemat Khansari, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasan Fisal Alesary, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

(2) Sadiq Karim, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hasan Fisal Alesary, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sadiq Karim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gisele Pereira de Carvalho, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Brazil.

(2) B.Puvarajan, Veterinary College and Research Institute Orathanadu, India.

(3) Gustavo Andreazza Laporte, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gisele Pereira de Carvalho, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (B. Puvarajan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Gustavo Andreazza Laporte, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, University of Texas, College of Pharmacy, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Saad Ahmad Khan, Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh, India.

(2) Shaari Bin Daud, Universiti Teknologi Mara Cawangan Pahang, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Masoud Bagherpour Zarchi, Yazd University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohammad Saad Ahmad Khan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shaari Bin Daud, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chih-Wei Pai, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Susan Akinkurolere, Kampala International University, Uganda.

(2) Lok Raj Sharma, Makawanpur Multiple Campus, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Susan Akinkurolere, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lok Raj Sharma, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Benjamin Kinyili, Kenya.

(2) Eguale Tadesse Kifle, Ethiopian Environment and Forest Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: 

(1) Igbokwe Obike Godwin, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Nigeria.

(2) Praveen Kumar, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Agriculture University, India.

(3) Mahamad Sayab Miya, Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Benjamin Kinyili, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Eguale Tadesse Kifle, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rezza Ruzuqi, Indonesia.

(2) Ramesh Rudrapati, Bule Hora University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rezza Ruzuqi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ramesh Rudrapati, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kamarulzaman Ab. Aziz, Multimedia University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Yun-Yeong Kim, Dankook University, Korea.

(2) Tajini Reda, Mines-Rabat School (ENSMR), Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akyene Tetteh, University of Mines and Technology, Ghana.

(2) Matthias O. Nkuda, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(3) Lam Weng Siew, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

(4) Salama Yusuf Yusuf, Zanzibar University, Tanzania.

(5) Iulia Muresan, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yun-Yeong Kim, Korea) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tajini Reda, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Prathyusha Engineering College, Anna University, India.

(2) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) I.Merlin. K.Davidson, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Syed Arif Hussain Rizvi, National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suprakash Pal, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Marina Mazón, Universidad Nacional de Loja, Ecuador.

(3) Pierozzi,  N.I, Brazil.

(4) Adalberto Emilio Pimentel Peñaloza, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, México.

(5) Mohamed Ahmed Gesraha, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (I.Merlin. K.Davidson, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Syed Arif Hussain Rizvi, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Anélia Marais, South Africa.

(2) Belkhodja Hamza, University of Mustapha Stambouli, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA 

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anélia Marais, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Belkhodja Hamza, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA