Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernandez, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Farhad Mirzaei, Animal Science Research Institute of IRAN (ASRI), Iran.

(2) Brishketu Kumar, College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Kumar Shinde, ICAR-Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute Avikanagar, India.

(2) Anil Mathur, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Farhad Mirzaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Brishketu Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sameh. S. Akkila, Al-Mustansiriyah Univeristy, Iraq.

(2) Eckart Haneke, University of Bern, Switzerland.

(3) Vivekaradhya M, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Srikumar G.P.V, Ayush University of Chhattisgarh, India.

(2) Sameer Ahmed Ansari, King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain.

(3) Nupur Rastogi, India.

(4) Shital Phuse, Sant Gadagebaba Amaravati University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sameh. S. Akkila, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Eckart Haneke, Switzerland) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Vivekaradhya M, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nduka Ekene Udoye, Covenant University Ota, Nigeria.

(2) Prachi Pandey, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nduka Ekene Udoye, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Prachi Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Diepiriye C. Okujagu, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Robert Kosova, University “Aleksander Moisiu”, Albania.

(3) Onuoha Fidelis Wopara, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.96/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Diepiriye C. Okujagu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Robert Kosova, Albania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Onuoha Fidelis Wopara, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Eduardo Cyrino Oliveira-Filho, Brazil.

(2) Mangoua Oi Mangoua Jules, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University , Côte d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eduardo Cyrino Oliveira-Filho, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mangoua Oi Mangoua Jules, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Aba-Toumnou Lucie, University of Bangui, Central African.

(2) Ishfaq Abidi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sanjay Swami, Central Agricultural University, Meghalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Aba-Toumnou Lucie, Central African) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ishfaq Abidi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hamdy A. Sliem, Internal Medicine, Suez Canal University, Egypt and College of Dentistry, Qassim University and EL-Jouf University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Kiranmayi, Acharya Nagarjuna University, India.

(2) Aina, Oluwagbemiga. Olanrewaju, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (P. Kiranmayi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aina, Oluwagbemiga. Olanrewaju, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahmoud Gharbavi, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) A.  Arboix, University of Barcelona Catalonia, Spain.

(3) Ruqia Asna Rabah, Gulbarga Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mahmoud Gharbavi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (A.  Arboix, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ruqia Asna Rabah, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Karmaoui, Southern Center for Culture and Sciences, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Charalampia M. Dimou, Aegean University, Greece.

(2) Bhaba Amatya, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(3) Sami Mili, Higher Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture of Bizerte, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Charalampia M. Dimou, Greece) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bhaba Amatya, Nepal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sami Mili, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

Upendra Kumar

(1) Birla Institue of Technology, Patna Campus, India.

(2) P. Krishnapriya, Mary Matha College of Arts and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Upendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (P. Krishnapriya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA