Peer Review History: Runoff Dynamics and Soil Erosion Assessment using a SWAT Model at Upper Cauvery River Basin

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Shekhar Kapoor, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research University, India.

(2) Dr. LUO, Ching-Ruey (Edward), Associate Professor, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Chekole Tamalew Asnik, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

(2) Jangam Deepika, ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chekole Tamalew Asnik, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jangam Deepika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Irrigation Scheduling on Growth, Yield and Irrigation Water use Efficiency of Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Khose Suyog Balasaheb, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India.

(2) R B Singandhupe, ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research Nagpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khose Suyog Balasaheb, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R B Singandhupe, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Flood Vulnerability Assessment in Paradip Coastal Area Using Weighted Overlay Index

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and HOD, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria da Glória Salgado Gonçalves, Geographic Studies Centre of the University of Lisbon (CEG, UL), Portugal.

(2) Sérgio António Neves Lousada, University of Madeira (UMa), Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bright Ojo, University of Arkansas, USA.

(2) Fizza Ejaz, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(3) Ishraque Bin Khalil, Bangladesh.

(4) Md. Ayman Azad, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

(5) Mostafizur Rahman, Begum Rokey University, Bangladesh.

(6) Muzzammil Mohabir, University of Guyana, Guyana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria da Glória Salgado Gonçalves, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sérgio António Neves Lousada, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) Agroforestry Systems in Togo

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sangita Sahni, Assistant Professor, Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Prakash Pralhad Sarwade, Shikshan Maharshi Guruvarya R. G. Shinde Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Antonio Francisco de Sousa, E.E.E.P Dom Walfrido Teixeira Vieira, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prakash Pralhad Sarwade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Antonio Francisco de Sousa, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Graph Databases: Revolutionizing Database Design and Data Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Elena Lanchares Sancho, Associate Professor, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Ola, David E., Federal College of Education Technical, Nigeria.

(2) Yash Jani, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Debajit Sensarma, Vivekananda Mission Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) J M Gnanasekar, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ola, David E., Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yash Jani, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. Ex Benth. Seed Germination Using Pretreatment Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Head (Retired), School of Biotechnology, Devi Ahilya University, India.

(2) Prof. Christopher Cullis, Case Western Reserve University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Irina M. Morar, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Eltayeb Ahmed Hamad Suliman, Sudan.

(3) Abdallah Lotfi, University of Gabes, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Irina M. Morar, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eltayeb Ahmed Hamad Suliman, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abdallah Lotfi, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Soil Texture and Bulk Density Mapping Using Soil Grids and Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis with Observed Data

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatemeh Ebrahimi Meymand, Soil & Water Research Institute, Iran.

(2) Peyman Amin, Yazd University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatemeh Ebrahimi Meymand, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Peyman Amin, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Quiescent Fluid over a Moving Flat Surface

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematics and Physics, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajendra Singh Yadav, University of Rajasthan, India.

(2) D. Chenna Kesavaiah, Vignan’s Institute of Management and Technology for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajendra Singh Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D. Chenna Kesavaiah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Price Spread, Marketing Efficiency and Postharvest Losses in Marketing of Selected kharif Vegetables in Palghar District of Maharashtra State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Riya Thakur, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar UHF, India.

(2) Neha Paliwal, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, India.

(3) Sazzala Jeevananda Reddy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Riya Thakur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neha Paliwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sazzala Jeevananda Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Pre-sowing Seed Treatments and Growing Media on Performance of Consecutive Sowing for Constant Production of Fenugreek Microgreens (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) under Shade Net

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Fábio da Costa Henry, State University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, UENF,  Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Raza Jamali, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan.

(2) Divya Parisa, Icar – Atari Umiam Barapani Meghalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jai Prakash Gupta, School of Agricultural Sciences, Raffles University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Raza Jamali, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Divya Parisa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA