Author Archive: Managing Editor

Peer Review History: Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Intradialytic Hypertension in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis at a Tertiary Care Center

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, Military Medical Academy, General Hospital Acibadem Belmedic, Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Fakhry Ahmed Salem, Alexandria University, Egypt.

(2) Anuj Dwivedi, Ranchi Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Fakhry Ahmed Salem, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuj Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessing the Content Relevance of Gender-based Violence News Articles in Tanzanian Newspapers on Reducing the Problem

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Augusto Neftali Corte De Oliveira, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

(2) Vizovono Elizabeth, India.

(3) Imran Nazeer, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Seema Shukla, School of Media and Communication Design, IMS Unison University, India.

(2) Krishna Pandey, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research & Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Augusto Neftali Corte De Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vizovono Elizabeth, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Imran Nazeer, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Associated Factors of Low Birth Weight among Newborns at Hospitals in Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashith Chandra Das, Jalalabad Ragib Rabeya Medical College, Bangladesh.

(2) Mohammad Ibrahim Shaik, Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences, Teaching Hospital and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashith Chandra Das, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Ibrahim Shaik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Histological and Biochemical Effects of Lutein on Paraquat-induced Renal Toxicity in Wistar Rats

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Diana Cecilia Tapia-Pancardo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Tlalnepantla, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sk Maruf Hossain, Bhawanipur Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Nazar M. Shareef Mahmood, Soran University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sk Maruf Hossain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nazar M. Shareef Mahmood, Iraq) | File 1 |NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Climate Risk Management among Smallholder Farmers: A Comparative Analysis of Flood-prone Alappuzha and Drought-affected Gondia in India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Universitaria Agustiniana, Colombia.

(2) Jacob Pitti, University of Panama, Panama.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nguyen Thi Dung, Bac Giang Agriculture and Forestry University, Viet Nam.

(2) J.Vasanthakumar, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Colombia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jacob Pitti, Panama) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Characterization of Some Leading Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cultivars in Bihar Condition Based on Yield and Chemical Quality Parameters

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Chumki Dutta, Assam Down Town University, India.

(2) M. Kumaresan, Vels Institutes of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chumki Dutta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Kumaresan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: High Pressure Processing: Pros and Cons

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Raffaella Preti, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

(2) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

(3) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Head of the Pediatric Surgery Service, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Moriken Sangare, Higher Institute of Veterinary Sciences and Medicine, ISSMV, Guinea.

(2) Banafsheh Bagheri, Tehran University of Medical Science, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moriken Sangare, Guinea) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Banafsheh Bagheri, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA