Peer Review History: Susceptibility of Aromatic and Non- aromatic Rice to Sitophilus oryzae L. and their Influence on the Insect and Infestation Rate under Sub-Himalayan Plains of West Bengal

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University, Miyazaki, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Seham Mansour Ismail, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Sumia Urainab, Government College University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seham Mansour Ismail, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sumia Urainab, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Infant Food Flours Made from Local Products to Combat Acute Malnutrition in Children Under 5 Years Old in Côte D’ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Tenured Associate Professor, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shalini H, JJM Medical College, India.

(2) T. M. Senthiarasi, The Tamilnadu Dr. M. G. R Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Hasan Chowdhury, St. Francis College NY, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shalini H, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T. M. Senthiarasi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ascorbic Acid Mediated Amelioration of Bridelia micrantha Induced Alterations in Haematological, Histological and Proximate Composition of the Carcass of African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Matheus Ramalho de Lima, Associate Professor, Federal University of Semi Arid Region, UFERSA, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehmet Resit Taysi, Bingol University, Turkey.

(2) Hesham Abozaid Ahmed, Agricultural and Biology Institute. National Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Najma Khatun, Cotton University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehmet Resit Taysi, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hesham Abozaid Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Najma Khatun, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antidiabetic and Protective Effects of Aqueous Seed Extract of Persea americana in the Pancreas of Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Arun Kumar Kapoor, Rohilkhand Medical College & Hospital, Bareilly M.L.N. Medical College, Allahabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anita Restu Puji Raharjeng, Universitas Islam Negeri, Indonesia.

(2) Peter Ozomata Balogun, Yaba College of Technology, University Lyon 1, France.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anita Restu Puji Raharjeng, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Peter Ozomata Balogun, France) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Analysis of the Contribution of Minimally Invasive Surgery Toto Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Robert Meves, Santa Casa School of Medicine, São Paulo University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Suyash Singh, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Bhawna Thakur, Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suyash Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhawna Thakur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Eco Friendly Management of Alternaria Blight Disease: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Supriya Pratap Babar, The Institute of Science, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) S. Sibmah Stalin, Nesamony Memorial Christian College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Supriya Pratap Babar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Sibmah Stalin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Ethylene Glycol and Diethanolamine Modified African Pear Seed Oil as Pour Point Depressants for Waxy Crude Oil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Cheikh Sall, Hod, Université Iba Der THIAM, Senegal.

Reviewers:

(1) Pawan Nandkishor Karwa, Dr D Y Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, India.

(2) Ranjan Kumar Singh, Raffles University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chethan S. G., Jawaharlal Nehru New College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pawan Nandkishor Karwa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjan Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Seed Priming on Adaptive Morphological Traits of Anaerobic Germination Tolerant Upland Rice Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashutosh Kumar, Assistant Professor, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anirban Bhowmik, Midnapore City College, India.

(2) Bipin Deochand Lade, Virginia Tech University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anirban Bhowmik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bipin Deochand Lade, United States) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Student Perceptions and Expectations of Peer Mentoring: A Study of the Lobomentoría Program at Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Rosemary Madzore, University of South Africa, Zimbabwe.

(2) Debo Sulaimon Arikewuyo, Nigeria.

(3) Nasrudeen Ayinde Malik, Osun State University, Nigeria.

(4) Sharadha S, Surana College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rosemary Madzore, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debo Sulaimon Arikewuyo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nasrudeen Ayinde Malik, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sharadha S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Rosemary Madzore, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Debo Sulaimon Arikewuyo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Nasrudeen Ayinde Malik, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Objective Visual Acuity Estimation via the Optokinetic Response to High-pass Filtered Stimuli: An Exploratory Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmad M Mansour, Professor, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.

Reviewers:

(1) Mona Abdelkader, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(2) Prakhar Chaudhary, Vinayak Siddi Hospital Eye and Child Care Centre, India.

(3) Italo Giuffre, Catholic University of Rome, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mona Abdelkader, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prakhar Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Italo Giuffre, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA