Peer Review History: Mathematical Modelling of Wastewater Treatment: A Review and Application

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Nwajuaku Ijeoma Immaculata, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Pravesh Chandra, Moradabad Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Sabadash Vira, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahendra S. Dhande, India.

(2) Santhosh B Panjagal, Kuppam Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nwajuaku Ijeoma Immaculata, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pravesh Chandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sabadash Vira, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Faculty Mobility Amid Regional Economic Disparities: A Qualitative Analysis of Teacher Outflow from Guangxi’s Private Universities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Takalani Samuel Mashau, Associate Professor, University of Venda, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda Management Institute, Uganda.

(2) Siti Nor’ain Binti Mohd Hashim, Sultan Idris Educational University, Malaysia.

(3) Philip Donald P. Herrera, Cebu Institute of Technology – University, Philippines.

(4) Jignesh Vidani, LJ University, India.

(5) Mauro Marinho Da Silva, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.

(6) Meltem Çengel Schoville, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Türkiye.

(7) Pratima Mishra, H.G.M. Azam College of Education, Dr P A Inamdar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage :8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Siti Nor’ain Binti Mohd Hashim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Philip Donald P. Herrera, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Basic Education and Its Impact for Career Development Goals among Adult Learners’ in Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maya Tcholakova, Associate Professor, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria.

Reviewers:

(1) Shedrack Ikechukwu Nwadike, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Umar Muhammad, Usmanu Danfodiyo University And Northwest University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) David Seetsa Makateng, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, India.

(2) Francis Moodu Yakubu, University of Alabama, USA.

(3) Olawumi Kayode Babatunde, University of Fort Hare, South Africa.

(4) Thanduxolo Albert Nomtshongwana, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shedrack Ikechukwu Nwadike, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Umar Muhammad, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge and Readiness for Menopause: Insights from Premenopausal Women in Rejomulyo Muang Dalam Samarinda City, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hom Nath Chalise, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Dr. Giou-Teng, Yiang, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fahri Özsungur, Mersin University, Turkiye.

(2) Dian Pratiwi, Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Manado, Indonesia.

(3) Renu Agarwal, Shrimathi Devkunvar Nanalal Bhatt Vaishnav College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fahri Özsungur, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dian Pratiwi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Renu Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinicopathological Study of Pityriasis Alba in Libyan Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sushmitha E. S., Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pronoy Das, India.

(2) Suneeta Panicker, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arijit Ash, Mankar Institute of Education and Research of Pharmacy Science, India.

(2) Sundaramoorthy Srinivasan, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pronoy Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suneeta Panicker, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI-Driven Open Source Intelligence in Cyber Defense: A Double-edged Sword for National Security

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Provakar Ghose, University of New Haven, United States.

(2) Himanshu Sinha, Unites States of America.

(3) Hemanth J, Visvesvaraya Technological University- Chikkaballapura, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Goswami, California University of Management & Sciences, USA.

(2) N W Chanaka Lasantha, IIC University of Technology, Sri Lanka.

(3) Chirag Mavani, USA.

(4) Jabin Geevarghese George, United States of America.

(5) Khorshed Alam, Lamar University, United States of America.

(6) Mani Gopalsamy, Kalasalingam University, India.

(7) Md. Mominul Islam, Begum Rokeya University, Bangladesh.

(8) Noman Habib, Institute of Industrial Electronics Engineering, Pakistan.

(9) Parveen Badoni, Chandigarh University, India.

(10) Preethi Kolluru Ramanaiah, USA.

(11) Rafia Islam, Begum Rokeya University, Bangladesh.

(12) Shaila Rana, Purdue University Global, United States of America.

(13) Yijie Weng, University of Maryland, United States.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Provakar Ghose, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Himanshu Sinha, Unites States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hemanth J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strengthening Compliance with Data Privacy Regulations in U.S. Healthcare Cybersecurity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Provakar Ghose, University of New Haven, United States.

(2) Md Nagib Mahfuz Sunny, Trine University, USA.

(3) Hossain Jaman Sohag, Begum Rokeya University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anand Laxman Mhatre, United States.

(2) Chandra Shekhar Pareek, USA.

(3) Cyrile Verdeyen, Netherlands.

(4) Keyur Patel, USA.

(5) Md Khalilor Rahman, Gannon University, USA.

(6) K. Malathi, Saveetha Engineering College, India.

(7) Narasimha Rao Boinapalli, USA.

(8) Olajide Soji Osundare, Nigeria.

(9) Sahil Arora, USA.

(10) Vajratiya Vajrobol, Asia University, Taiwan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Provakar Ghose, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md Nagib Mahfuz Sunny, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hossain Jaman Sohag, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Long QT Syndrome Masquerading as Refractory Epilepsy in an Adolescent

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abha Chandra, Senior Professor, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Integral University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Balaji, St John’s National Academy of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Nanthini K, Kongu Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.Balaji, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nanthini K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels at Presentation and its Association with Platelet Recovery in Newly Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia in Children

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Serpil Ünver Saraydın, Associate Professor , Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lim Ming Chiang, Hospital Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, Malaysia.

(2) Mudassar Abbas Siddique, Niazi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(3) Sahar M. Hussein, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lim Ming Chiang, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mudassar Abbas Siddique, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sahar M. Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Building Academic Resilience through Positive Thinking: A Study of University Students in Syria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Tauqeer Abdullah, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Paul Agmabire Akendita, AAMUSTED, Ghana.

(3) Kayode Ezecheal OBAFEMI, Kwara State University, Malete, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prodeep Kumar Mondal, CUPB, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tauqeer Abdullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul Agmabire Akendita, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kayode Ezecheal OBAFEMI, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA