Peer Review History: Protected Cultivation of Horticultural Crops: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zewdu Siraw, Assistant Professor, Debre Markos University, Ethiopia.

(2) Prof. Ioana Grozea, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

(3) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Manzi, K. H, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(2) Vinod Fogawat, CSIR- Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) NDOKOYE Pancras , University of Technology and Arts of Byumba(UTAB), RWANDA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manzi, K. H, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinod Fogawat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Paddy-based Cropping Systems and their Sustainability: A Micro-level Study of Nellore District of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Raul Pascalau, University Of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

(2) Pompy Deka, SCS College of Agriculture, AAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jose Antonio Valles Romero, University of The Incarnate Word, United States.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raul Pascalau, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pompy Deka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Anatomical Snuffbox Lipomas – Diagnosis, Particularities and Surgical Management: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagih Mommtaz Ghannam, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohsin Ghanchi, College of Dental Science and Hospital, India.

(2) Imane Boujguenna, Ibnouzohr University, Morocco.

(3) Rajaonarison Ny Ony Narindra Lova Hasina, Antananarivo University, Madagascar.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohsin Ghanchi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imane Boujguenna, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajaonarison Ny Ony Narindra Lova Hasina, Madagascar) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bio Efficacy of Different Fungal Bio-agents on Juvenile Mortality of Root Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita under Laboratory Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal researcher, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Alyaa Abdul-Ridha Hanash, Wasit University, Iraq.

(2) Swagat Ranjan Behera, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alyaa Abdul-Ridha Hanash, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swagat Ranjan Behera, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Metformin and Caffeine’s Influence on Lipid Profile Indices of Streptozotocin-Induced Dyslipidemia in an Animal Model

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Begum Rokeya, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Adil Jumani, Zayed Military Hospital, United Arab Emirates.

(2) Rajendra Nath, King George’s Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adil Jumani, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajendra Nath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determinants of Infertile of Infertile Women Requesting Assisted Reproduction Techniques in a Low Resource Setting in Western Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shankar Srinivasan, Rutgers – School of Health Professions, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Paras Wani, GNCT, India.

(2) Nichanahalli Siddappa Kubera, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paras Wani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nichanahalli Siddappa Kubera, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Modified SIVR Mathematical Model of Covid-19 Post-vaccination Stability Analysis in Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xingting Wang, Assistant Professor, Louisiana State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Ramesh, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Jeremiah Savali Kilonzi, Meru University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

(3) Naga Soundarya Lakshmi V.S.V, Thiruvalluvar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajala Adebisi Shukurat, Tai Solarin University Of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Ijaola Alani Lateef, Federal University Of Agriculture Abeokuta, Nigeria.

(3) Idisi Isaiah Ok, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jeremiah Savali Kilonzi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Naga Soundarya Lakshmi V.S.V., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Administering Serially Diluted Suprecur and Motilium (Dopamine Blocker) on the Breeding Performance of Clarias gariepinus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed KARMAOUI, Errachidia. University Moulay Ismail, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Shikha Shrivastava, Indira Gandhi government PG College, India.

(2) Retno Hartati, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shikha Shrivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Retno Hartati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Product Innovation and Service Innovation on Interest in BMT Sarana Wiraswasta Muslim through Trust as an Intervening Variable

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Elizabeth Chacko, Christ University, India.

(2) Shepherd Mutangabende, University of Fort Hare, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elizabeth Chacko, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shepherd Mutangabende, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Composting Cow Dung Enriched with Vivianite (Phosphocompost) for Agricultural Use in the Balaza Lawane Locality (Far North, Cameroon)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Chakravarthy Thejesh, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Elena M. Manaig, College of Agriculture, Laguna State Polytechnic University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chakravarthy Thejesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elena M. Manaig, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA