Peer Review History: Diversity and Utilization of Forestry Resources for Enhancing Household Food Security in the Leh Himalaya, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nguyen Van Toan, School of Biotechnology, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Reviewers:

(1) Ewunetu Tazebew Gonete, College of Agriculture, Food and Climate Science, Injibara University, Ethiopia.

(2) Darlington Eze Ekechukwu, University of East London, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ewunetu Tazebew Gonete, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Darlington Eze Ekechukwu, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Community-Based Intervention for Hearing Loss: Impact of Hearing Screening Programme in Ondo West Local Government Area

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

(2) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, Research Center and Post Graduate, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Saumya Kothiyal, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) Gagandeep Singh Mann, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhavya B M, India.

(2) Subaasri B Ramesh Sankar, Kanchi Kamakoti Child Trust Hospital Affiliated With Hi Tone Hearing, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saumya Kothiyal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gagandeep Singh Mann, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Sensitivity of Nitrofurantoin Versus Fluoroquinolones against E. coli Isolates from Urinary Tract Infections: A Single-centre Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Marwa Abdel Aziz Zeid, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

(2) Badar Uddin Umar, Central Asian University, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Badar Uddin Umar, Central Asian University, Canada.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marwa Abdel Aziz Zeid, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Badar Uddin Umar, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence, Risk Factors, Knowledge and Hygiene Practices Regarding Intestinal Parasitic Infections among Orphanage Children in Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hiba Riyadh Al-Abodi, Assistant Professor, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Kalina Stoyanova Pavlova, Medical University of Varna, Bulgaria.

(2) Maroof Sabti Juma Al-Ammash, University of Samarra, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kalina Stoyanova Pavlova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maroof Sabti Juma Al-Ammash, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Crop Productivity with Biofertilizers: Exploring Multifunctional Benefits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Laleh Naraghi, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shital Prabhakar Aher, Ashoka College of Education, India.

(2) Renu Gupta, SKUAST, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shital Prabhakar Aher, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Renu Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Levels of Engagement of South Asian Participants in Health Research: Effectiveness of Community-Based Research (CBR) Framework

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Durjoy Majumder, West Bengal State University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ritika Rocque, India.

(2) Maurice B. Silali, Mount Kigali University, Rwanda.

(3) Rudy Hartono, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) H. Sudiyono, Ikip siliwangi, Republic of Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ritika Rocque, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maurice B. Silali, Rwanda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rudy Hartono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of the Farmers towards Antibiotic Usage in Layer Birds in Haryana, India: A Cross-sectional Survey

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Arafat Jaman, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(2) Zul Ariff Abdul Latiff, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chidinma Stacy Iroha, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(2) Prima Ayu Wibawati, Univeristas Airlangga, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Arafat Jaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zul Ariff Abdul Latiff, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Population Dynamics and Ecological Role of Chrysoperla spp. In Major Agricultural crops: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh,  Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Raghav Garg, India.

(2) Rukhsana Khatoon, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raghav Garg, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rukhsana Khatoon, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Oviposition Behaviour of Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Different Host Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Krishnaveni, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ajay Sharma, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(3) Mohamed Khamar, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jacob Pitti, University of Panama, Panama.

(2) Ajay Sharma, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(3) Mohamed KHAMAR, Mohammed V University in Rabat Morocco, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Krishnaveni, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajay Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohamed Khamar, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determining the Role of Pharmacist in Cardiovascular Disease-Related Health Promotion and in Hypertension and Dyslipidemia Management: A Cross-Sectional Study in Lahore, Pakistan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Roshina Bano, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

(2) Kanchana. R, Dr. Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dayananda Sagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roshina Bano, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanchana. R., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA