Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) R. D. Dodiya, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

(2) Nayan Roy, M.U.C. Women`s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. D. Dodiya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nayan Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

(2) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Haider Ali Kareem, University of Misan, Iraq.

(2) Hene L. Hapinat, Northern Iloilo State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haider Ali Kareem, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hene L. Hapinat, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Leindah Devi, India.

(2) Mohamed Mohamed EL-Komi, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Leindah Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamed Mohamed EL-Komi, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Caroline  Atieno Ombok, Alupe University, Kenya.

(2) Daniel Lungu, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Caroline Atieno Ombok, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniel Lungu, Zambia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan Ince, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Agnes Valencia-Raymundo, Manila Central University, Philippines.

(2) Thizwilondi Ananias Magadze, Sefako Makgatho University, South Africa.

(3) Khaoula Ben Ismail, University of Tunis EI Manar, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agnes Valencia-Raymundo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thizwilondi Ananias Magadze, South Africa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Khaoula Ben Ismail, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Agnes Valencia-Raymundo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shital P. Dehankar, Shivaji University, India.

(2) Sanjay Roy, Netaji Subhas Open University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) N.PRABHU, Sethu Institute of Technology (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shital P. Dehankar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjay Roy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ozdal Gokdal, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Kanchi Siva Prasad, SKR Govt Degree College, India.

(2) K. Veeravelan, Bharathidasn University, India.

(3) Olena Grechana, Zaporizhzhya State Medical and Pharmacy University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dharmasoth Rama Devi, Dr Samuel George Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Emily M. Cataluna, Iloilo Doctors’ College, Philippines.

(3) Hemalatha. K, Acharya & BM Reddy College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Manisha N Shah, Sarvajanik University, India.

(5) Thitiphan Chimsook, Maejo University, Thailand.

(1) Utthapon Issara, Rajamangala university of technology thanyaburi, Thailand.

() T.Thirumalesh, Veterinary College Shivamogga, Karnataka Animal Veterinary and Fishery Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kanchi Siva Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Veeravelan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Olena Grechana, Ukraine) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Université Antananarivo, Madagascar.

(2) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Marzieh Babashpour-Asl, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Lopamudra Jena, Sri Sri University, India.

(3) RAMIRO CRUZ DURÁN, Universidad Nacional Autónoma DE México.

(4) Toure Mamadou, Nangui abrogoua university, Côte d’ivoire.

(5) MAKAYA M. Joseph“, Aube Nouvelle” University – Ouagadougou ,  Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Madagascar) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Yildirim, Harran University, Türkiye.

(2) Sucheta Dahiya, SGT University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Yildirim, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sucheta Dahiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Yunus Bayram, Turkiye.

(2) Prunar Florin, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” From Timisoara, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yunus Bayram, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prunar Florin, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA