Peer Review History: Evaluation of Anthelmintic and Neuropharmacological Activities of the leaves of Chassalia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Patrizia Diana, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tariq Ahmaad Lone, Government Degree College, India.

(2) Madhu.C. Divakar, PPG College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aabsheen Saba Khanam, Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Hafiza Ayesha Andleeb, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tariq Ahmaad Lone, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhu.C. Divakar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Efficacy of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Therapy in Inducing and Maintaining Remission from Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Zoran Todorovic, University of Belgrade and University Medical Center “Bezanijska Kosa”, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarmad Qassim AL-Tameemi, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Flaviu Tabaran, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarmad Qassim AL-Tameemi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Flaviu Tabaran, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microbial Load and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Microflora Isolated from Smoked Catfish and Mackerel Sold in Ghanaian Markets: A Potential Health Threat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bagiu Iulia-Cristina, Assistant Professor, ”Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Dorsaf Moalla Rekik, Sfax University, Tunisia.

(2) Nannu Shafakatullah, Mangalore University, India.

(3) Jayita Goswami, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dorsaf Moalla Rekik, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nannu Shafakatullah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jayita Goswami, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression Studies for Fibre Quality Traits in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajni Devi, CSIR-IHBT, India.

(2) Amina Ashfaq, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/0

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajni Devi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amina Ashfaq, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Zoonoses in the Indian Poultry Sector and Prospect of One Health Approach as a Sustainable Solution: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) W. Jean Dodds, USA.

(2) Raquel Soares Casaes Nunes, UFRJ, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S K Das, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (W. Jean Dodds, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raquel Soares Casaes Nunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth and Flowering Behaviors of Bottle Gourds (Lagenaria siceraria L.). cv. Narendra Jyoti

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Suvalaxmi Palei, Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Narayan Lal, ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suvalaxmi Palei, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narayan Lal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Public Health Policies and Programs for Alzheimer’s and Dementia: A Data-Driven Evaluation of Effectiveness and Areas for Improvement in the United States

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari, Assistant Professor, Doctor Harisingh Gour Central University, India.

(2) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Uma Maheswara Rao, SVECW, India.

(2) G. S. Lavekar, India.

(3) Mayada Senouci, Doctor Moulay Taher University of Saida, Algeria.

(4) P Ramya, MVGR College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Uma Maheswara Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. S. Lavekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mayada Senouci, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (P Ramya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Traditional to Advanced Models: A Comparative Study between Time Series and Machine Leaning Models in Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Laban Gasper, Tanzania.

(2) M. Jeyakarthic, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Laban Gasper, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Jeyakarthic, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Plant Growth Regulators on Yield and Qualitative Parameters in Strawberry (Fragaria x anannasa) cv. Winter Dawn under Protected Cultivation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) El Bouzdoudi Brahim, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Morocco.

(2) Mihaela Lungu, National Research and Development Institute for soil Science, Agrochemistry and Environment, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (El Bouzdoudi Brahim, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mihaela Lungu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Association between Ava II Polymorphism in LDL Receptor Gene and Hyperlipidemic Ischemic Stroke Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Viktar Lemiasheuski, Associate Professor, Belarusian State University, Republic of Belarus.

(2) Prof. Khadiga Mohamed Abu-Zied, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mudassir Mirza, Osmania Medical College, India.

(2) Pavan Kumar Sharma, Rama Medical University, India.

(3) Izabel Cristina Rodrigues Da Silva, University of Brasilia, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Luay Qasim Abdulhameed, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Diyala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mudassir Mirza, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pavan Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Izabel Cristina Rodrigues Da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA