Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Hakeem Adekunle, Georgia State University, USA.

(2) Guillermo Magnou, Universidad ORT Uruguay, Uruguay.

(3) K. P. Suresh, ICAR- NIVEDI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hakeem Adekunle, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Guillermo Magnou, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K. P. Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelkader Basli, University of 20 August 1955 Skikda, Algeria.

(2) Javed Iqbal, Northeast Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdelkader Basli, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Javed Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Matheus Ramalho de Lima, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Naveen Nivas S, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, India.

(2) John Vincent I. Manalo, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology, Philippines.

(3) Marian Onwude Agbugui, Edo State University Uzairue, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naveen Nivas S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Vincent I. Manalo, Philippine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Marian Onwude Agbugui , Nigeria ) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jaypee O. Bathan, Philippines.

(2) Frankie B. Nkone, The Open University of Tanzania, Tanzania.

(3) Lovely Srivastava, United University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jaypee O. Bathan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Frankie B. Nkone, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lovely Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhargava Kotte, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhargava Kotte, India)) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) VS.Balamurugan, Bharathiar university, India.

(2) Yassin Hassen Umar, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (VS.Balamurugan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yassin Hassen Umar, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Satya Narayan Satapathy, SOADU, India.

(2) Ahmet Murat Günal, Haliç University, Türkiye.

(3) Olufunke A. Omogunloye-Adeoye, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satya Narayan Satapathy, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmet Murat Günal, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Olufunke A. Omogunloye-Adeoye, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University,  Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Avtar Singh Bimbraw, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anise Jorfi, Khouzestan Applied Science University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avtar Singh Bimbraw, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anise Jorfi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) C. R. Rajeesha, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

(2) Sudipta Roy, Bengal College of Pharmaceutical Technology, India.

(3) Nitin Wamanrao Shinde, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. R. Rajeesha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudipta Roy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nitin Wamanrao Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Usama Ahmed, Shenzhen University, China.

(2) Harish Kumar. K. S, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Usama Ahmed, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harish Kumar. K. S, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA