Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Commonly Used Antiseptic Soap in Reducing the Bacterial Load on the Palms of Some Undergraduate Students of Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike Ikwo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Pramod Kumar Mahish, Govt. Digvijay Postgraduate College, India.

(2) A.Seetha Devi, Hindu College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pramod Kumar Mahish, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Seetha Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Date of Sowing and Varieties on Growth and Yield of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under Humid Climatic Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gehan Shaker Bakhoum, Agricultural and Biological Res. Institute, NRC, Egypt.

(2) Anuj Kumar Rai, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gehan Shaker Bakhoum, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anuj Kumar Rai, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microbial Quality of Home-made Street Vended Beverages in Reused Bottles Sold in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivali Khandelwal, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

(2) Mrunali Patel, Ganpat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivali Khandelwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mrunali Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Human Energy Consumption in Paddy Cultivation Practices

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Nandini Saha, Veer Kunwar Singh College of Agriculture, India.

(2) Amelie L. Chico, UM Panabo College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nandini Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amelie L. Chico, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Economic Analysis of Production and Maintenance Cost of Per Milch Animal Buffaloes of Ghazipur District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdullah Antaria, Indonesia.

(2) Tanane Omar, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdullah Antaria, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tanane Omar, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: General Structure and Properties of Cyclic Codes Over GF2

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xingting Wang, Assistant Professor, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.

(2) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Chella Pandian, Vivekananda College, India.

(2) Soumak Biswas, India.

(3) Brahim Boudine, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

(4) Kobara Kazukuni, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Azmi, Vignan Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Chella Pandian, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soumak Biswas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Brahim Boudine, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kobara Kazukuni, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Soumak Biswas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Species of Nepenthes (Pitcher Plant) in Selected Areas of San Isidro, Northern Samar

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hewa Kattuge Sameera Madusanka, The Open University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(2) Mohd Norfaizal Bin Ghazalli, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hewa Kattuge Sameera Madusanka, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd Norfaizal Bin Ghazalli, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Fusarium Wilt of Castor (Ricinus communis L.) Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Ricini with Biorationals and Fungicides under In vitro Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nguyen Van Toan, Vietnam National University, Vietnam.

Reviewers:

(1) Vishal Ramchandra Patil, Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Agriculture, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, India.

(2) Vaka Madhuri, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/110

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vishal Ramchandra Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vaka Madhuri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Response of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (L.) to Organic and Inorganic Fertilization in Makurdi, Southern Guinea Savannah, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Pinar Adiguzel, Cukurova University, Turkiye.

(2) Kabita K. Shah, Pennsylvania State University, U.S.A.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pinar Adiguzel, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kabita K. Shah, U.S.A) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Length-weight Relationships and Condition Factors of Three Commercially Important Fish Species from Roseires Reservoir, Blue Nile, Sudan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Matheus Ramalho de Lima, Associate Professor, Federal University of Semi-Arid Region, UFERSA, Brazil.

(3) Prof. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) P.A Vikas, CMFRI, India.

(2) Mohammed Gaber Desouky, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Egypt.

(3) Uduak Sylvanus Jacob, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashis Kumar Panigrahi, University of Kalyani, India.

(2) Basudev Mandal, Narajole Raj College, India.

(3) Praveen Ojha, Kishori Raman (PG) College, (Affiliated to Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Agra, UP, India), India.

(4) Ravindra Pawar, College of Fisheries (DBS Konkan Agricultural University), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P.A Vikas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Gaber Desouky, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Uduak Sylvanus Jacob, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA