Peer Review History: The Effect of Dietary Sodium Alginate on the Growth and Survival of Giant Freshwater Prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Fathy Elshaer Mohammed, Al-Azhar university, Egypt.

(2) Oluwatosin Abidemi Ogunkalu, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Turkiye.

(3) Nuttaporn Chanchay, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Safaa H. Aboolo, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fathy Elshaer Mohammed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oluwatosin Abidemi Ogunkalu, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nuttaporn Chanchay, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Biochemical and Phytochemical Characteristics of ‘Abhinav’ and ‘Anand Roma’ Tomato Varieties and their Juice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Phoebe Kaddumukasa, Science, Kyambogo University, Uganda.

(2) Behnaz Shahrokhisahneh, Cihan University-Erbil, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ankita Sharma, College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (JNKVV), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Phoebe Kaddumukasa, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Behnaz Shahrokhisahneh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Nanotechnology in Agriculture: Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Environmental Sustainability

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Eddy Silamat, Pat Petulai University, Indonesia.

(2) Aditya Sinha, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eddy Silamat, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditya Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Heterotic Potential in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) for Certain Yield and its Contributing Traits in Salt-Affected Soil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Shraddha Karcho, JNKVV, India.

(2) M S Kanwar, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agriculture Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, India.

(3) AKM Quamruzzaman, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shraddha Karcho, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M S Kanwar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (AKM Quamruzzaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation of Foxtail Millet Probiotic Powder Enriched with High Protein and Fibre

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ehoche Edache Elijah, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Soumya Sucharita Sahoo, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

(3) Ena Ray Banerjee, University of Calcutta, India

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yahya Sabah Abdulameer, Veterinary Medicine College, Alqasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ehoche Edache Elijah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soumya Sucharita Sahoo, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ena Ray Banerjee, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Groundwater Quality Assessment for Irrigation Suitability Purpose in the Khelna River Basin of Aurangabad District, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed M. El Nady, Professor, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Illiassou Naroua, Universite Boubakar Ba de Tillaberi, Niger.

(2) Ahamed Sulthan J, DR. R.K.S College of Arts and Science, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Fares F. Fares, Benghazi University, Libya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pramoda G, Governement Science College, Chitradurga, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Illiassou Naroua, Niger) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahamed Sulthan J, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fares F. Fares, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Professional Reputation and Service Efficacy of Teachers in Public Elementary Schools

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Şenay Sezgin Nartgün, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Türkiye.

(2) Rahul Mittal, School of Media Studies, Jaipur National University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Şenay Sezgin Nartgün, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rahul Mittal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Development of Nano-Carrier Entrapped Vitamin D3-Oral Formulation: A Step Forward in Vitamin D3 Therapy

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ravi Kumar Chittoria, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Cristina Jorge, ULS Sao Jose, Portugal.

(2) Fedyeh Haghollahi, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Kshirsagar Dudheshwar Chandrakant, Gourishankar Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cristina Jorge, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fedyeh Haghollahi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kshirsagar Dudheshwar Chandrakant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Tax Incentives on Non-Oil Tax Revenue: Econometric Case Study from Nigeria (1981-2022)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Yohanna gyang jugu, University of jos, Nigeria.

(2) Tekalign Negash Kebede, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

(3) Olusola James Oladejo, Lead City University, Nigeria

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ngozi Blessing Ndum, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yohanna gyang jugu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tekalign Negash Kebede, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Olusola James Oladejo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Microbiological Quality of Bathing Waters in the Mamou Region, Republic of Guinea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Laleh Naraghi, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Devangee P. Shukla, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Vincent Ninkuu, CAAS, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Meenakshi, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidhyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Devangee P. Shukla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vincent Ninkuu, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA