Peer Review History: Factors Influencing Work Output or Performance among Nurses and Midwives in a Teaching Hospital in Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S, Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, All India Institutes of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maryam Eri, School of Health Management and information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Eman Mohammed Abdel-Hakam, Benha University, Egypt.

(3) Dessalegn Haile, Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maryam Eri, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eman  Mohammed Abdel-Hakam, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dessalegn Haile, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Genetic Diversity and Variation in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench): A Comprehensive Study on Cultivars

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. V. Jegadeeswari, Associate Professor, Horticultural College and Research Institute for Women, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Dr. Moaed Al Meselmani, Grantham Centre, The University of Sheffield, UK.

(3) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Richard Olayiwola, University of New England & Chickpea Breeding, Australia.

(2) M James, Acharya N.G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Richard Olayiwola, Australia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M James, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Triiodothyronine Variations during Resumption and Examination Periods: A Study among First-Year Medical Students

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lokendra Bahadur Sapkota, Assistant Professor, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal.

Reviewers:

(1) Shama Praveen, Himalayan College of Nursing, Swami Rama Himalayan University, India.

(2) Sanjib Borah, Lakhimpur College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shama Praveen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjib Borah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Influence of Water Supply Schemes on Agriculture: A Case Study of Unnichchai Irrigation Scheme in Batticaloa, Sri Lanka

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nebi Bilir, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Md. Abiar Rahman, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) W. A Shyanika Lakmali, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(2) T. Arthi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (W. A Shyanika Lakmali, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T. Arthi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical, Therapeutic, and Evolutionary Aspects of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Lyell’s Syndrome in the Pediatric Department of the University Hospital Center of Libreville: Report of Two Clinical Cases

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fuyong Jiao, Head of the department, Children’s Hospital of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital ( S P P H ), China.

Reviewers:

(1) Adinarayana Andy, USA.

(2) Aparna Matpathi, IQPADS Research Solutions, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adinarayana Andy, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aparna Matpathi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physicochemical Quality of Reduced Fat Mayonnaise with Aloe vera Powder as a Natural Antioxidant

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Tenured Associate Professor, Government College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Christian Chukwuemeka Oli, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Nuray Gamze Yörük, Dokuz Eylül University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Christian Chukwuemeka Oli, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nuray Gamze Yörük, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Major Depression in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Attending the Renal Clinic in a Teaching Hospital in Port Harcourt Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veeramuthumari, Assistant Professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ivana Dohcheva Karajovanov, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, Republic of North Macedonia.

(2) Akshay Prashanth Giri, Sri Ramachandra institute of higher education and research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ivana Dohcheva Karajovanov, Republic of North Macedonia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akshay Prashanth Giri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Development Goat Patties Using Red Onion Peel (Allium cepa L.) Powder as Fiber Agent

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Birhanu Zeleke Tilinti, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

(2) Patel Shivangi Bharatbhai, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10


Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Birhanu Zeleke Tilinti, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Patel Shivangi Bharatbhai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effect of Various Substrates on the Attachment of Juvenile Brown Mussel (Mytilopsis adamsi)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Mohan Raj, Sir Theagaraya College, University of Madras, India.

(2) Marifah Yuliani, Universitas Muhammadiyah Berau, Indonesia.

(3) S. Balamurugan, Govt Arts College, Bharathidasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. Mohan Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marifah Yuliani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Balamurugan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identifying English Language Needs of Yemeni Medical Students: An ESP Study at Dhamar University

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Naga Dhana Lakshmi, India.

(2) Sunanda M. Shinde, Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) Barnali Chetia, Indian Institute of Information Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Naga Dhana Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunanda M. Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Barnali Chetia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA