Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Effect of Various Substrates on the Attachment of Juvenile Brown Mussel (Mytilopsis adamsi)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Mohan Raj, Sir Theagaraya College, University of Madras, India.

(2) Marifah Yuliani, Universitas Muhammadiyah Berau, Indonesia.

(3) S. Balamurugan, Govt Arts College, Bharathidasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. Mohan Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marifah Yuliani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Balamurugan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identifying English Language Needs of Yemeni Medical Students: An ESP Study at Dhamar University

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Naga Dhana Lakshmi, India.

(2) Sunanda M. Shinde, Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) Barnali Chetia, Indian Institute of Information Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Naga Dhana Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunanda M. Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Barnali Chetia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Regional Spatial Planning Utilization and Environmental Impacts: A Case Study in Buntulia District, Pohuwato Regency, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudirman Nganro, Graduate School, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.

(2) Nur Khairiyah Mohammad, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Dennis Annan Mogire, Mount Kenya University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudirman Nganro, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nur Khairiyah Mohammad, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dennis Annan Mogire, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of Financial Structure and Director Diversity on Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Intellectual Capital in Indonesia’s Financial Sector

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Associate Professor, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Idris Mohammed, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

(2) Calebbw’ Aumamanyaga, Maasaimara University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Idris Mohammed, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Calebbw’ Aumamanyaga, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of the Inflation Function under the Influence of Money Supply and the Monetary Reaction Function in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Associate Professor, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Kinjal Manani, Thakur Global Business School, India.

(2) Sanjeev Gupta, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kinjal Manani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjeev Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of TP53 Gain-of-Function Mutations on Metabolic Reprogramming in Prostate Cancer Progression

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gul Ozcan, Professor, University of Istanbul, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Kirolos Eskandar, Helwan University, Egypt.

(2) Thendral Yalini, PES University, India.

(3) Januaris Mwanthi Mukaa, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kirolos Eskandar, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thendral Yalini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Januaris Mwanthi Mukaa, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hepato-Nephroprotective Effects of Gongronema latifolium and Ocimum gratissimum in Diabetic Rats Exposed to Carbon Tetrachloride

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maria Luisa Kennedy Rolon, University of North Alabama, USA.

(2) Prof. Chunhua Zhou, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Vaishali Bhardwaj, Rajshree Group of Institutions of Bareilly, India.

(2) Muhammad Ikram, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

(3) Chandrashekhar D. Upasani, SNJB’s Shriman Sureshdada Jain College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vaishali Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Ikram, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chandrashekhar D. Upasani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Empirical Study on Interdependence of Coffee Futures Prices and Farm Gate Prices in Major Coffee Producing Countries

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hasan Vural, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gaurab Luitel, Tribhuvan University, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Nepal.

(2) Heena Murad Khanche, Pillai College of Arts, Commerce and Science, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gaurab Luitel, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Heena Murad Khanche, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Transaction Costs in Agriculture Inputs Procurement: Evidence from Farmer Producer Companies in Kolar District of Karnataka

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Munib Ur Rehman, Cooperatives Training College, Pakistan.

(2) Asfaw Temesgen Bari, Wallaga University, College of Business and Economics, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Munib Ur Rehman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asfaw Temesgen Bari, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Alterations in Whole Blood Count Parameters and Some Inflammatory Biomarkers of Occupationally Exposed Metal Recyclers: A Case-Control Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, Assistant Professor, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Shakeeb Ullah, Gomal University, Pakistan.

(2) Anshika Srivastava, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Obodo Basil Nnaemeka, Purdue University, United States.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shakeeb Ullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anshika Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA