Peer Review History: GIS-Based Analysis of Crop Yield Trends in Response to Climate Change Using Data-Driven Analysis Systems (DDAS) Techniques

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R H M Somanath Swamy, Assistant Professor, R Y M Engineering College, India.

(2) Dr. Ravi Kumar Kotturi, Assistant Professor, Vidya Jyothi Institute of Technology (Autonomous), Hyderabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrutyunjay Padhiary, Assam University, India.

(2) Jaikumar M. Patil, Shri Gajanan Maharaj College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrutyunjay Padhiary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jaikumar M. Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancement of the Small-Signal Stability of Nigerian 330 kV Transmission Network using Static Synchronous Compensator

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Tanta University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) R.Nithya, C.K. College of Engineering & Technology, Anna University, India.

(2) Zulfiana Safitri Majid, State Polytechnic of Ujung Pandang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R.Nithya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zulfiana Safitri Majid, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) for Enhanced Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Under Irrigated Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh K. Singh, University of Florida, United States of America.

(2) Namita Bisht, William Carey University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh K. Singh, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Namita Bisht, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Cluster Front Line Demonstration on Yield and Economics of Kharif Sesame in Semi-arid Regions of Gujarat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Onwubiko Emmanuel Chidiadi, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Nigeria.

(2) Shyamrao Kulkarni, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(3) Prashant Shrivastava, Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Onwubiko Emmanuel Chidiadi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shyamrao Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prashant Shrivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Anticancer, Thrombolytic and Antimicrobial Activities of Heliotropium indicum (Indian turnsole)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Biswajit Dash, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Kolkata, India, And Adamas University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nehal Rami, Ganpat University, India.

(2) H. M. Shadid Hossain Snigdha, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(3) Chandrajeet Kumar Yadav, National Medical College, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nehal Rami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (H. M. Shadid Hossain Snigdha, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chandrajeet Kumar Yadav, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Potential of Nigella Sativa Seeds: A Modern Perspective on an Ancient Remedy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Katayoun Haryalchi, Associate Professor, Guilan University of Medical Science, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Halavath Ramesh, Loyola College Chennai, India.

(2) Kamil khan professor, Integral institute of medical science lucknow, India.

(3) Ramazan Ayaş, Necmettin Erbakan University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Halavath Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamil khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ramazan Ayaş, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Occurrence of Major Pests of Sarpagandha in Mild Tropical Plain Zone of Arunachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Alyaa Abdul-Ridha Hanash, Wasit University, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Iraq.

(2) I. Paramasiva, Agricultural Research Station, India.

(3) Mohammed Aziz  El houmaizi, Mohammed First University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alyaa Abdul-Ridha Hanash, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (I. Paramasiva, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammed Aziz El houmaizi, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In silico Design and Validation of CRISPR/Cas9 gRNAs for Enhancing Drought Tolerance and Yield in Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharvan Kumar, Invertis University, India.

(2) Ogbu, Chinenye Angela, David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences, Nigeria.

(3) P H Janjal, MGM College of Agricultural Biotechnology, VNMKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sharvan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ogbu, Chinenye Angela, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P H Janjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Science of Bloom: A Review on Exploring the Photoperiod Responsive Flowering Pathway

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal researcher, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Farshid Talat, AREEO, Iran.

(2) Pooja Sharma, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be) University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Farshid Talat, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pooja Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antagonistic Efficacy of Native Trichoderma Isolates Against Agricultural Plant Pathogens in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Paulina Guzmán Guzmán, Instituto Tecnológico de Morelia, Tecnológico, México.

(2) Esli Lobaina Lobaina, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Chile.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paulina Guzmán Guzmán, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Esli Lobaina Lobaina, Chile) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA