Peer Review History: Genetic Diversity among Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Genotypes: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Zaki Sukor, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

(2) Bikila Gebeyehu Eticha, Wollega University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohd Zaki Sukor, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bikila Gebeyehu Eticha, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Soil Nutrient Status for Optimizing Cassava Cropping Systems in Southern Benin: A DRIS Model Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sucheta Dahiya, SGT University, India.

(2) Tapasya Tiwari, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and  Technology, India.

(3) Kirti Verma, Gyan Ganga Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

(4) Pragya Kulkarni, Govt. V.Y.T. PG Autonomous College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shabina Fatma, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, RIMS Ranchi, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.32/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sucheta Dahiya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tapasya Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kirti Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Pragya Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Extent of Awareness Level of Sugarcane Farmers on Crop Residue Management Innovations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Chinmoy Kumar Panigrahi, School of Electrical Engineering, KIIT Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Widaryanti, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pelita Nusantara, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anwesha Mandal, School of Agricultural Sciences, GD Goenka University, India.

(2) Imam Santosa, Jenderal Soedirman University, Indonesia.

(3) Jacob Pitti, University of Panama, Panama.

(4) Mushtaq Ahmad, The Neotia University, India.

(5) Parveen Kumar, SKUAST, India.

(6) Raquel Soares Casaes Nunes, Brazil.

(7) Rasha Nagy Arafa, Egypt.

(8) Rebeca Aguirre Hernandez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico.

(9) S. Kerketta, India.

(10) Tajidan, University of Mataram, Indoesia.

(11) Yitbarek Kiros Weldegerima, JigJiga University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chinmoy Kumar Panigrahi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Widaryanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Site-directed Mutagenesis’s Prospective Uses in Enhancing Cereal Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Satya Narayan Satapathy, SOADU, India.

(2) Madhwendra Kumar Pathak, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Goutam Mahata, India.

(2) Ramesh Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satya Narayan Satapathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhwendra Kumar Pathak, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating CRISPR/Cas9’s Progressive Role in Crop Enhancement and Sustainable Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Cirilo O. Ybanez Jr., Davao Oriental State University, Philippines.

(2) Dumpapenchala Vijayreddy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cirilo O. Ybanez Jr., Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dumpapenchala Vijayreddy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Vulnerability to Food Insecurity and Coping Strategies Adopted by Rice Farming Households in Ekiti State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Kumar Das, Sri Sri University, India.

(2) Avinash Mishra, G.L.M. Agriculture College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Abd Hassan Kidhim, Iraq.

(2) Nikhil Thakur, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, India.

(3) Teshome Kassahun Gebeyehu, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manoj Kumar Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Avinash Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of the Functional Kinetic Performance of Mmii of a Group of Amateur Runners from the Municipality of Gurupi, Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hemanth Kumar Arumugam, Govt. Kilpauk Medical College, India.

(2) Ankit Singh Jadon, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(3) Terry Ellapen, North-West University, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Danelina Emilova Vacheva, Medical University of Pleven, Bulgaria.

(2) N.Meena, Government Cuddalore Medical College and Hospital (Erstwhile Rajah Muthiah Medical College and Hospital), India.

(3) Prakat Karki, CHRIST (Deemed to be) University, India.

(4) Subhashis Biswas, ICFAI University, India.

(5) Umair Arif, Xian Jiaotong University, China.

(6) Vitor Alves Marques, Federal University of Goias, Brazil.

(7) Wasihun Abate Sentie, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hemanth Kumar Arumugam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankit Singh Jadon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Terry Ellapen, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Gladiolus (Gladiolus spp.) Intercropping with Coriander, Fenugreek and Dill on Growth, Yield and Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pravinsinh K. Parmar, N M College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rajya Lakshmi, Marey Academy, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Mansour Al-Hakeem, Al-Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

(2) E.Aruna, ANGRAU, India.

(3) Haifaa Abass  Hussein, Al-Qadisiyah University ,college of science, Iraq.

(4) Indrani Kakati Baruah, Sustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory, USA.

(5) Lalita Rana, Sugarcane Research Institute, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Agricultural University, India.

(6) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar, Scientific Research Institute of Sericulture, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pravinsinh K. Parmar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajya Lakshmi, Canada) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Foliar Nutrition and Vine Top Harvesting in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) for Growth, Vine Top and Tuber Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, State University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

(2) Haraprasad Bairagya, School Education, Kasemnagar N.A.J. High School, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Carlos Yance Carvajal, Universidad Estatal De Milagro, Ecuador.

(2) Delian Elena, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Bucharest, Romania.

(3) Fadhil M. AL-Mohammed, AL-Furat AL-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(4) H Manoranjan Sharma, Waikhom Mani Girls’ College, India.

(5) Imran Arshad, SAA Technical & Specialized Services Establishment, UAE.

(6) Leonardo Ornella, Argentina.

(7) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq,

(8) Parshant Bakshi, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu, India.

(9) Pham The Hue, Tay Nguyen University, Viet Nam.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haraprasad Bairagya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mathematical Model for Mitigating the Community Spread of COVID – 19 in Afikpo North LGA of Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(2) Prof. Özlem Gürünlü Alma, Muğla Sıtkı Kocman University, Turkey.

(3) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Attapon Cheepsattayakorn, Western University, Thailand.

(2) Madan Lal, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Attapon Cheepsattayakorn, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madan Lal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA