Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Open v/s Protected Cut Flower Rose Farming in Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Ukav, Adiyaman  University, Turkey.

(2) Mohd Zulkifli Muhammad, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fora Andreea-Florina, University of Oradea, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ismail Ukav, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd Zulkifli Muhammad, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a Rural Community of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

(2) Prof. Shankar Srinivasan, Rutgers – School of Health Professions, USA.

(3) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Reqgi First Trasia, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia.

(2) Chizaram Winners Ndubueze, Imo State University, Nigeria.

(3) Essoh Ayimba, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Lomé, Togo.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Gasaba Emmanuel, University of São Paulo, Burundi.

(2) S.Saradha, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, India.

(3) Umesh D. Laddha, MET’s Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Reqgi First Trasia, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chizaram Winners Ndubueze, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Essoh Ayimba, Togo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Nutrient Management in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): An Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Nishtha Seth, India.

(2) Meduri Swapna Sree, Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Akhmad Zubaidi, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nishtha Seth, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Meduri Swapna Sree, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Controlling Diseases in Porang Plants (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) Using Endophytic Fungi In vitro

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Thitiporn Ditsawanon, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Thailand.

(2) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Richa Yadav, Wisdom College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thitiporn Ditsawanon, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhananjay Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Defiance On the Implementation of WHO-guidelines: Antibiotic Use in under Five Years Children with Acute Gastroenteritis in District Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S, Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, All India Institutes of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maksum Radji, University of Esa Unggul, Indonesia.

(2) Utkarsh Ghate, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maksum Radji, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Utkarsh Ghate, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Nanotechnology in Sericulture: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Andrzej Kowalski, Jan Kochanowski University, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Zain Ul Abadeen, Riphah College of Veterinary Sciences (RCVetS), Riphah International University-Lahore Campus, Pakistan.

(2) Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, Manipur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar, Scientific Research Institute of Sericulture, Uzbekistan.

(2) Pradeep Kumar Mishra, India.

(3) Raeed M. Abdullah, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zain Ul Abadeen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Zinc and Humic Acid Application on Growth Parameter, Yield and Yield Components and Quality Traits of Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Milan Acharya, Nepal.

(2) Yenni Asbur, University Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sandip Vitthalrao Mahajan, Shikshan Maharshri Dnyandeo Mohekar College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ibrahim Olanrewaju Ibrahim, Nigeria.

(2) Prabu P C, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Milan Acharya, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yenni Asbur, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigation of the Ergonomics and Workload of Farm Women during in Planting and Weeding Operations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sukhbir Singh, ICAR-CIAE, Bhopal, India.

(2) Sapunii Sebastian, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India.

(3) Jhunilata Bhuyan, OUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zakariyah Abdulbasit, Nasarawa State College of Agriculture, Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amit A. Shahane, Central Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sukhbir Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sapunii Sebastian, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jhunilata Bhuyan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Local Management in the Varietal Diversity of Rainfed Rice (Oryza glaberrima) from Goh-Djiboua and Mountains Districts in Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates.

(2) J. Vasanthakumar, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Vasanthakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of High Yielding Groundnut Varieties for North Transitional Zone of Karnataka State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Serferbe Signaboubo, Chad.

(2) Randrimpenohaja Andriamanalina R. Jens, Ambositra Higher Institute of Technology, Madagascar.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Abdulrahman, Basic Vocational Agriculture Training School Tambu-Daura, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Serferbe Signaboubo, Chad) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Randrimpenohaja Andriamanalina R. Jens, Madagascar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA