Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Zankat Shrutiben Bhikhabhai, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(2) Stefan Talu, The Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zankat Shrutiben Bhikhabhai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Stefan Talu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Gbs Manikantha Chowdary, India.

(2) Pravin Babasaheb Khaire, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gbs Manikantha Chowdary, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pravin Babasaheb Khaire, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Ojha, CSJMU, India.

(2) Aditya Shukla, Indian Institute of Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jitendra Ojha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditya Shukla, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Kolawole Saheed Oluwasola, Istanbul University, Turkey.

(2) Ridar Hendri, University of Riau, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kolawole Saheed Oluwasola, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ridar Hendri, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Atmanand M Haigar, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Masoomeh Yari Kalashgrani, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Atmanand M Haigar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Masoomeh Yari Kalashgrani, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Soil, Water and Environmental Research Institute – Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Praveen Kumar Jaga, JNKVV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hanaa Mohamed Sakara, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Praveen Kumar Jaga, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(2) Eman Hamdy Abd El-Azeiz, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(3) N. Supraja, Thiruvalluvar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eman Hamdy Abd El-Azeiz, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Supraja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrinal Choudhury, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ajeet Kumar, College of Basic Sciences and Humanities (CBS&H), Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrinal Choudhury, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajeet Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.

(2) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mrinal Choudhury, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Naziya Banu, University Of Mysore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mrinal Choudhury, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naziya Banu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Kumar Yadav, India.

(2) Anita Mahapatra, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anil Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anita Mahapatra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA