Peer Review History: College Students Returning Hometown to Start a New Business for Rural Revitalization from the Perspective of Family

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) M. R. Ramesh, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, India.

(2) Seham Ahmed Alazab, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aleksey V. Breusov, RUDN University, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Russia.

(2) Jovana Lj. Cvetkovic, Univeritet u Pristini, Serbia.

(3) Linda Superville, Trinidad & Tobago.

(4) P. Pandia Rajammal, Deemed to be University, India.

(5) Rahmat Kaur Kochar, India.

(6) Rebelín Echeverría Echeverría, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, México.

(7) Reema Chakrabarti, India.

(8) Senthilkumar Meyyappan, Nalla Malla Reddy Engineering College, India.

(9) Sirikanok Klankhajhon, Naresuan University, Thailand.

(10) Uma Sheokand, P P Savani University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Indah Suciati, Alkhairaat University, Indonesia.

(2) Jose Manuel Salum Tome, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Chile.

(3) Maria de los Angeles Mayorga Alvarez, Ecuador.

(4) Natalia Vronska, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Latvia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. R. Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seham Ahmed Alazab, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analyzing the Impact of Wing Flexural Axis Position on the Dynamics of a Very Flexible Airplane Using Strain-based Formulation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Esraa K. Al – Gazzi, Iraq.

(2) Bereket Netsanet Bekele, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R A Dubal, Shahu College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Shirin Ebadi, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Esraa K. Al – Gazzi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bereket Netsanet Bekele, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Agricultural Cooperative Societies on Farm Input Supply in Ekiti State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, College of Veterinary Science & A.H., Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Akash Paul, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Bangun Joko Laksono, Universitas GrahaKarya Muara Bulian, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akash Paul, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bangun Joko Laksono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Farm Partial Budget Analysis of Onion (Allium Cepa L.) for the Application of Nitrogen and Spacing in Southern Tigray, Ethiopia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Vilas Jadhav, Institute for Social and Economic Change, India.

(2) Himanshu Verma, College of Agriculture & Environmental Technology, Surajmal University, India.

(3) Devegowda S R, Rajiv Gandhi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. Santhosh, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University (ANGRAU), India.

(2) Cpa Gabriel Tenesi, Kisii University, Kenya.

(3) Narasimha Reddy Donthi, India.

(4) S. Navaneetha Krishnan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vilas Jadhav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Himanshu Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Devegowda S R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Research on the Usage of PPT in Mathematics Teaching in China

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. A. Magesh, Assistant Professor, Sri Sai Ram Engineering College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Waqas Mahmood, The Islamia University, Pakistan.

(2) Sharadkumar Pralhad Sawant, J. Somaiya Medical College, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

(3) SVB Subrahmanyeswara Rao, Ramachandra College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amor Hasic, University of Novi Pazar, Srbian.

(2) Nora V. Marasigan, Batangas State University The National Engineering University, Philippines.

(3) Sakshi Chaturvedi, Banansthali Vidyapith, India.

(4) Ting Jing Jing, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sally John, MGIMS, India.

(2) Sujatha Jamuna Anand, Loyola Institute of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waqas Mahmood, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sharadkumar Pralhad Sawant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (SVB Subrahmanyeswara Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Macro and Micro Mineral Compositions at Different Depths of Forest Nursery Soils in Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mahnaz Gümrükçüoğlu Yiğit, Associate Professor, Sakarya University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) R. S. Chaurasia, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, India.

(2) Pablo Huerta Fernandez, La Molina National Agrarian University, Perú.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dwi Susanto, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(2) Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates.

(3) Shahira H. El-Moslamy, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), Egypt.

(4) Sheenam Thatai, Amity University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Matthew, S., Yaba College of Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. S. Chaurasia, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pablo Huerta Fernandez, Perú) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Abemaciclib in the Adjuvant Setting for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Som Subhro Biswas, Radiologist, Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Centre, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Al-Zahrawi University College, Iraq.

(2) S. Sharon Sonia, Dr.YSR University of Health Sciences, Government Medical College, India.

(3) A. Manickam, VIT Bhopal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Walid Galal Elshazly, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Usha Rani. R, Hill View Institute of Nursing, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Sharon Sonia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A. Manickam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on the Evaluation of the Profitability, Efficiency and Investment Trends of Different Poultry Farming Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Arindam Chakraborty, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Revathy M, KPR College of Arts Science and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bangun Joko Laksono, Universitas Graha Karya Muara Bulian, Indonesia.

(2) Chala Duguma Olika, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

(3) Ziad Ahmad Alabdallah, Al-Furat University, Syria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arindam Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Revathy M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Radioprotection Compliance Rules Study in Dakar’s Hospitals, Senegal

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, Chair & Director, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Susie Medeiros Oliveira, Brazil.

(2) Yanqi Zong, College of Graduate and Professional Studies, Trine University, United States.

(3) Vicente Beltrán Campos, University of Guanajuato, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tajudeen Ayinde Olaniyan, Oyo State College of Nursing and Midwifery Eleyele Ibadan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amandeep Kaur, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Susie Medeiros Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yanqi Zong, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vicente Beltrán Campos, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: New Insights in the Treatment of Sickle Cell Disease in Childhood

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Monalisha Saikia Borah, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Atika Dave, Parul Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Ashvini Kumar Dwivedi, DAV, Indore University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Somali  Das, NIIS Group of Institutions, India.

(2) Sudha Singh, MUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Alinda Isaac, Makerere University, Uganda.

(2) CH. Vidya, Government City College, Affiliated to Osmania University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monalisha Saikia Borah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atika Dave, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashvini Kumar Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA