Peer Review History: Impact of Processing and Extraction Methods on the Phytochemical Composition of Garcinia Kola Stem Bark and Stone Breaker Leaves

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Uttara Singh, Assistant Professor, Govt. Home Science College, Panjab University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Usman Muhammad Tukur, School of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, China

(2) Kolawole D. Afolabi, University of Uyo, Nigeria

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Usman Muhammad Tukur, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kolawole D. Afolabi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Lac Cultivation as a Pathway to Prosperity: A Success Story from Ranchi, Jharkhand

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Anmol Kumar Mishra, ICAR-National Institute of Secondary Agriculture, India.

(2) Suniti Kumar Jha, ICAR- Central Research Institute for Jute & Allied Fibres, India.

(3) Soumen Ghosal, Indian Institute of Natural Resins and Gums, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anmol Kumar Mishra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suniti  Kumar  Jha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soumen Ghosal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modern Claims Management: A Comparative Analysis of Guidewire ClaimCenter and Duck Creek Claims

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Zuber, Associate Professor, Scope Global Skills University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shankha Shubhra Goswami, Abacus Institute of Engineering and Management, India.

(2) Madan Mohan Tito Ayyalasomayajula, Aspen University, USA.

(3) M.B. Fathima Sanjeetha, South Eastern University, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shankha Shubhra Goswami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madan Mohan Tito Ayyalasomayajula, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M.B. Fathima Sanjeetha, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Histopathological Study of Subacute Administration of Saccharum officinarum Leaf Extract on Some Organs of Rat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, Associate Professor, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Aziz, Egypt.

(2) Aisha Sethi, Government College University, Pakistan.

(3) Dhananjay Sharma, Amity University Haryana, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Aziz, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aisha Sethi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dhananjay Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Protective Effects of Flavonoids-rich and Saponins-rich Extracts from Tiger Nuts and Date Fruits on Prostate Histoarchitechture in Aluminum-exposed Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sachin Kumar Jain, Oriental University, MP, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Halimat Yusuf Lukman, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

(2) Narinder Kumar, Cluster University Jammu J&K, India.

(3) M. Shankar, Adichunchanagiri University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Halimat Yusuf Lukman, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narinder Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. Shankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Color Perception and Saliva Stimulation – Decoding Connections: Direct, Indirect or None?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Madhulika Banerjee, Vishnu Dental College, India.

(2) Dhirenkumar babubhai bhoi, kamdhenu university, India.

(3) Rupanjan Roy, Narayana Multispecialty Clinics, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Madhulika Banerjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhirenkumar babubhai bhoi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rupanjan Roy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Evaluation of the Financial Performance of Indian Public Sector Banks with Special Reference to Capital Adequacy and Asset Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Subbarayudu Thunga, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research, India.

(2) Neha garg, Ggsipu, India.

(3) Saptarshi Mukherjee, KLES’s IMSR, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subbarayudu Thunga, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neha garg, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saptarshi Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evidence-Based Prescription Strategies for Clomiphene Citrate in Male Hypogonadism and Fertility Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

(2) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Adjunct Professor, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Manh Nguyen Truong, Ho Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University, Vietnam.

(2) Talal aldarawsh, Al Safeer Surgical Hospital, IRAQ.

(3) Mary Olugbenga, Ambrose Alli University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manh Nguyen Truong, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Talal aldarawsh, IRAQ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mary Olugbenga, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: High Dose-Short Duration Therapy of Cholecalciferol as a New Therapeutic Approach in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain Associated with Vitamin D Deficiency

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Triki Mohamed Amine, Sahloul University Hospital, Tunisia.

Reviewers:

(1) Emad Eldin Mohamed Abdelatief, Middle East University- Jordan, Egypt.

(2) Gaurav Bhatnagar, Maharashtra Institute of Physiotherapy, India.

(3) Niraj Kumar, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emad Eldin Mohamed Abdelatief, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gaurav Bhatnagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Niraj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AP2/ERF Transcription Factors in Crop Plants’ Disease Resistance Response

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan , Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Gangadhara Doggalli, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Chaya G B, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gangadhara Doggalli, , India)) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chaya G B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA