Peer Review History: In vitro Growth of Trichophyton Rubrum in the Presence of 80% Ethanolic Extract of Grapefruit Pepins as Antifungal Agent

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Dewa Ayu Made Adnyaswari, Udayana University, Indonesia.

(2) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Raghad Ali Sahib Al-Musawi, University of Kufa, Iraq.

(2) Farsana K, VPSV Ayurveda College, India.

(2) N. Irabanta Singh, Manipur (Central) University, India.

(2) Rupali Somnath Endait, Radhabai Kale Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Suneeta Panicker, Dr. D.Y. Patil Arts, Commerce, and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dewa Ayu Made Adnyaswari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhananjay Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of NPK and Growth Regulators on Yield Attributes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Bundelkhand University, India.

(2) Sudhakara Rao, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Md Riton Chowdhury, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajesh Kumar Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudhakara Rao, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Saffron Blooms Beyond Soil: A Thorough Review on Soilless Corm Production Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Sadegh Sargolzaei, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Torbat Heydarieh University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Saeid Kamyabix, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mochammad Farkan, Jakarta Technical University of Fisheries, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amir Parnian, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Sadegh Sargolzaei, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saeid Kamyabi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of BAP in In-vitro Conditions for Promoting Shoot Growth in the Nodal Segment of Rosa indica L.

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Jdaidi Nouri, University Jendouba, Tunisia.

(2) Rachamalla Ravi Teja, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jamile Nazari, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences ‎and Natural Resources, Iran.

(2) Rezekinta Syahputra Sembiring, Indonesia.

(3) Susilawati, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia.

(4) Zinhle Manda, South African National Biodiversity Institute, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Alessandra Ramos Lima, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

(2) Joshua Olumide Matthew, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jdaidi Nouri, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rachamalla Ravi Teja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Anthropogenic Impacts on Stubb’s Creek Forest Reserve, Nigeria: A Remote Sensing and GIS Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mayank Pandey, Technology Enabling Centre, Guru Ghasidas Central University, India.

(2) Mohammed Kareem Sameer, Middle Technical University, Technical Institute of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anand Upadhyay, India.

(2) Faidance Mashauri, University of Uélé, Democratic Republic of Congo.

(3) G. Venkatesha, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, India.

(4) Panah Mohammadi, Tabriz University, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(5) P. S. Satheesh Kumar, NPR College of Engineering and Technology, Affiliated to Anna University, India.

(6) Seifu Kebede Debela, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mayank Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Kareem Sameer, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Detection of Land Use Changes in Forests Using Satellite Image Classification Based on Deep Learning: A Case Study of Sardasht Forests

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Musumba Teso Philippe, Université Evangelique en Afrique, Democratic Reublic of Congo.

(2) Khose Suyog Balasaheb, Indian Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Musumba Teso Philippe, Democratic Reublic of Congo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khose Suyog Balasaheb, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adoption of Pest Management Practice Wise Green Technologies Utilization Behaviour of Trichy and Madurai District Farmers in Rice-based Ecosystem

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Phạm The Hue, Tay Nguyen University, Vietnam.

(2) Joel Matiku Joshua, Mwalimu Julius K. Nyerere University of Agriculture and Technology, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Fauzi Bin Mohd Yunus, Malaysia.

(2) Tirus Muya Maina, Murang’a University of Technology, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Zafitody Conscient, University of Toamasina, Madagascar.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Phạm The Hue, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joel Matiku Joshua, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Combining Microbial Enriched Organic Manures with Inorganic Nutrients on Physiological Characteristics and Productivity of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, Associate Professor, The University of Poonch Rawalakot AJK, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Mahmoud Gaafar, University of Sadat City, Egypt.

(2) M. Pushpa Devi, Kongunadu Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bertha Mudamburi, University of Namibia, Namibia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Mahmoud Gaafar, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Pushpa Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biofertilizers- Towards Sustainable Agriculture Development

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lalita Rana, Sugarcane Research Institute, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) E. Aruna, ANGRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amelie l. Chico, University of Mindanao Panabo Campus, Um Panabo College, Philippines.

(2) Benjamin Valladares Carranza, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, México.

(3) Sachi Gupta, GD Goenka University, India.

(4) Hanaa A. Abokoura, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute (SWERI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt.

(5) Indrani K Baruah, USA.

(6) Janani P R, Padmavani Arts and Science College for Women, India.

(7) Lyhour Hin, Cambodia.

(8) Mehrtash Eskandaripour, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran.

(9) Mirzakhodjaev Bakhtiyar Anvarovich, Uzbekistan.

(10) Moumita Malakar, Central University of Tamil Nadu, India.

(11) Radoslaw Walkowiak, Poland.

(12) R. Jebakumar, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(13) S. Manoharan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(14) Sachin Kumar, J.V. College, Baraut, India.

(15) Seyma Merve Kaymaz Muehling, China.

(16) Yad vir singh, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Adolfo Arturo Del Rio Mora, Universidad Michoacana De San Nicolas De Hidalgo, Mexico.

(2) AK Joshi, Dr YSP University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(3) Ata Jahangir Moshayedi, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, China.

(4) Darshan k, India.

(5) Santosh Kumar Srivastava, India.

(6) Tankeswar Gohain, Nagaland University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lalita Rana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (E. Aruna, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemistry and Evaluation of Acute Toxicity of Aqueous and Hydroethanolic Extracts of Pavetta corymbosa Leaves (Rubiaceae)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jean-Paul Ngbolua Koto-Te-Nyiwa, University of Kinshasa, Congo DR

Reviewers:

(1) Sarita Chaurasia, Sri Venkateshwara College of Pharmacy, Osmania University, India.

(2) Thiombiano A. M. Emmanuel, University Joseph KI-Zerbo, Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Disha Pant, GBPUAT, India.

(2) Mustafa Eray Bozyel, Dokuz Eylül University, Türkiye.

(3) Shadrack Donkor, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarita Chaurasia, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thiombiano A. M. Emmanuel, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA