Peer Review History: Accessibility, Quality, and Significance of Education for Educationally Deprived Children

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Khakim Ashari, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University, Indonesia.

(2) Pornchai Jedaman, Rajabath Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sadaf Konain Ansari, Niazi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(2) Vijay Kumar Bharati, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Luis Fernando González Beltrán, National University of México, México.

(2) Mirjana Kocaleva Vitanova, Goce Delcev University, R.N.Macedonia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Khakim Ashari, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pornchai Jedaman, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cultivating Resilience: Exploring Root Systems in Hydroponic Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bishun Deo Prasad, Assistant Professor, Bihar Agriculture College, Sabour, Bihar Agricultural University, Bihar, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré – UNIVC, Brazil.

(2) Miguel Armando López Beltrán, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates.

(2) Kukuh Setiawan, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(3) Shubhashri Kumari, OP Jindal University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Pankaj Gupta, Sunrise University, India.

(2) Pavitra B V, Om Sterling Global University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Miguel Armando López Beltrán, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Evaluation of Different Formulations of Nomuraea rileyi (Farlow) Samson against Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Siniša Franjić, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

(2) Gabriela Beatriz Alejo, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, Instituto de Biología de la Altura, Consejo Nacional de InvestigacionesCientíficas y Técnicas, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Layth Haider Altayar, Al-Safwa University College, Iraq.

(2) Maryam Ajam Hassani, Shahrood University of Technology, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siniša Franjić, Bosnia and Herzegovina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gabriela Beatriz Alejo, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Scoping Review on Youth Participation in Agriculture: Sustainable Development, Food Security, and Economic Growth

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

(3) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Carlo Artemi, Italy.

(2) Dauda Nathan Jamiyal, Gombe State Poytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré – UNIVC, Brazil.

(2) Kepha Charles Luvinga, Tengeru Institute of Community Development, Tanzania.

(3) Tanima Dutta, Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, India.

(4) Wellington Ribeiro Justo, Regional University of Cariri – URCA, Federal University of Pernambuco – UFPE, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Chandan Kumar Panda, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Hussin Jose Hejase, Al Maaref University, Lebanon.

(3) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(4) Negalign Nigatu Oynaka, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Carlo Artemi, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dauda Nathan Jamiyal, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study of the Antimicrobial and Wound Healing Activities of the Ethanolic Leaf Extract of Anchomanes difformis (Blume) Engl. Pallidus

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jinyong Peng, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Nilima Abhijeet Thombre, MET’s Institute of Pharmacy, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Rangeel Singh Raina, Govt Medical College, India.

(3) Sagarika Nayak, KISS Deemed University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Payaam Vohra, NIPER, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hafiza Ayesha Andleeb, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Subrato Kumar Barman, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh.

(3) Thi Cam Van Do, Hanoi University of Industry, Vietnam.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nilima Abhijeet Thombre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rangeel Singh Raina, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sagarika Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Climate Change on Global Agriculture: Challenges and Adaptation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mosammat Mustari Khanaum, North Dakota State University, USA.

(2) Mondher Fetoui, Arid Regions Institute, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mithi Mithila, India.

(2) Rakshit Jakhar, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Oumou Diancoumba, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Bamako (ENSup), Mali.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mosammat Mustari Khanaum, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mondher Fetoui, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Natural Gas Consumption and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Selected African Countries

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ehsaneh Nejad Mohammad Nameghi, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Kalaiselvi, Idhaya College of Arts & Science for Women, India.

(2) Dancan Kiama, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Manjunatha B, Visvesvaraya Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Kalaiselvi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dancan Kiama, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determinants of Equine Foot Diseases in Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khalfa Ali, Associate Professor, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Japheth Joel Kalang, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(2) Essam Samir Soliman, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Luis Remedios Hernández, Cuba.

(2) Mary Aricha Yakubu, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria.

(3) Om Singh, ICAR-IVRI, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hanumanth Sankar, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College, India.

(2) Mohd Zamri-Saad, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Sachin Kumar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Japheth Joel Kalang, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Essam Samir Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Features and Outcome of Sickle Cell Patients in Pediatric Emergency Departments in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA and Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabhakar Patro J, KC General Hospital, India.

(2) Jonas Wolf, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Haseeb Ahmad, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) Magesh Sachidanandam, King Institute of Preventive Medicine and Research, India.

(3) Ne Win, Asia-Royal Hospital, Myanmar.

(4) Sudhir Kumar Atri, Pt. B. D. Sharma Pgims Rohtak, India.

(5) Susumu Inoue, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prabhakar Patro J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jonas Wolf, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Coexistence of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency in Sickle Cell Anaemia Patients: Insights from Maiduguri, Nigeria’s North-East Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, Assistant Professor, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahid Khan, University of Malakand, Pakistan.

(2) Rakesh Kumar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gomaa Sulaiman, University of Tripoli, Libya.

(2) Sudha Singh, MUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Amy Amutha Amanda Muthu Krishnan, Hospital Sultanah Nora Ismail, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahid Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rakesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA