Peer Review History: Evaluation of Anti-urolithiasis Activity by Nucleation Assay

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shankar Srinivasan, Rutgers – School of Health Professions, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) E. Gayathri Priyadarshini, Vivekananda Dental College for Women, India.

(2) Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, ‘Gr. T. Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(3) Ajay Kumar Srivastava, St Xavier’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christulas Jyoti, Tata Main Hospital College of Nursing, India.

(2) Ibrahim Kani Aminu, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.

(3) Makkasau Plasay, Panakkukang College School of Health Sciences, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Karbab Ahlem, Ferhat Abbas Setif1 University, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (E. Gayathri Priyadarshini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ajay Kumar Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effective Treatment Approaches for Tic Disorder: A Clinical Analysis of 60 Cases

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Bemina Ja, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Smitha Madhavan, Lincoln University College, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wei Yi Lee, Changhua Christian Hospital, Taiwan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bemina Ja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Smitha Madhavan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Influential Factors that Guide Students of the University of Education, Winneba, Toward Choosing Teaching Career Path

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Riza Erdem, Pamukkale University, Türkiye.

(2) Ece Genç Yöntem, Yeditepe University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Riza Erdem, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ece Genç Yöntem, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysing the Impact of Major Financial Crisis on Macroeconomic Variables and Stock Prices: An Empirical Study of Stock Market of United Kingdom

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Stoicuta Nadia Elena, University of Petrosani, România.

(2) Rashmi Akshay Yadav, JAIN Deemed-to-be University, CMS Business School, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Batrancea Larissa Margareta, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Phillip G. Bradford, University of Connecticut, USA.

(2) Yiming He, South China University of Technology, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Stoicuta Nadia Elena, România) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rashmi Akshay Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physical, Functional and Microbiological Parameters of Tomato-Broccoli Blended Instant Vegetable Soup Mix

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tatjana Radosavljević, Institute of Pathophysiology, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Manorama Kanuri, PJTSAU, India.

(2) David Juan Ramos Huallpartupa, Jose Maria Arguedas National University, Peru.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hanan Mohamed Abdo Al-Sayed, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manorama Kanuri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (David Juan Ramos Huallpartupa, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Spacing and Row Proportions of Turmeric + Okra Intercropping System of Odisha in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Yaa Oguabi Osei-Mensah, Institute of Statical Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Ghana.

(2) Ranjita Bezbaruah, Assam Agricultural University, Horticultural Research Station, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anselmo Enrique Ferrer Hernandez, Havana University, Cuba.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yaa Oguabi Osei-Mensah, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjita Bezbaruah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case Report of Breast Myofibroblastoma: A Bad Looking Benign Tumor

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA and Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Waheeb Radman Al-Kubati, 21st September University, Sana’a University, Yemen.

(2) Jigna Patel, SBKS MI&RC, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rahma Yaiche, University of Medicine of Tunis, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waheeb Radman Al-Kubati, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jigna Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modified Universal Integral Regulator for Quadrotor UAV in the Presence of External Disturbances

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Rasheed, University of Technology, Iraq.

(2) S. Vidhya, Cauvery College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Zahraa Salah Ahmed, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Rasheed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Vidhya India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge Level of Diarrhea among Biology Students in Enugu State Colleges of Education

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Kamal Dyab Haemaia, Assiut University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Luis Remedios Hernández, Cuba.

(2) B Nagaraju, KLEF Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Kadhim, University of Wasit, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Kola Srikanth Reddy, DRYSRUHS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luis Remedios Hernández, Cuba) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B Nagaraju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of PD-1 / PD-L1 Blockade to Increase NK Cells Cytotoxicity in Killing Cancer Cells: Article Review”

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yao Atteby Jean-Jacques, Felix Houphouët Boigny University, Ivory Coast.

Reviewers:

(1) Avneet Kaur, Ggdsd College, India.

(2) Enrique Wulff, ICMAN-CSIC, Spain.

(3) Deepak Sethi, Rabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akila E, Al-Ameen College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) T. Sundar, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avneet Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Enrique Wulff, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deepak Sethi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA