Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chandra Jyoti Sonowal, Assistant Professor, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Murugesan, UPASI Tea Research Foundation, Regional Centre, India.

(2) Ankit Kumar Singh, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tesfaye Lishan, Mizan Tepi University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Murugesan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankit Kumar Singh, Nepal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jong-Wuu Wu, National Chiayi University, Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

(3) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Piyush Raja, RAM Literature and Research Foundation, India.

(2) Mansour Salah-Eddine, University Hassan 2, Morocco.

(3) V S Vijaya Krishna V, Presidency University, India.

(4) Chao lian, Northeastern University, China.

(5) Ariq Idris Annaufal, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Faraz Siddiqui, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, Bhubaneswar, India.

(2) Indirani M, Adithya Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Mina Eshaq Tawfilis Dawood, Damietta University, Egypt.

(4) N. UmamaheswarI, Tagore College of Arts and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Seiji Muranaka, Yokohama City University, Japan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Piyush Raja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mansour Salah-Eddine, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (V S Vijaya Krishna V, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Chao lian, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Ariq Idris Annaufal, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emily Chepngetich Sitienei, Associate Professor, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ebrahim Rahbar Karbasdehi, University of Tehran, Iran.

(2) Jacob Poripo, Isaac Jasper Boro College of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Preeta Hinduja, Iqra University, Pakistan.

(4) Abdulkareem Habibat Bolanle, Al- Hikmah University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gayatri Moharana, ICAR- Central Institute for Women in Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1)  Dior Manta Tambunan, Murni Teguh University, Indonesia.

(2)  Lynard Bobby L. Asirit, Japan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ebrahim Rahbar Karbasdehi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jacob Poripo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Preeta Hinduja, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Abdulkareem Habibat Bolanle, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Pooja Bhatt, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, India.

(2) Trisha Sinha, Gopal Narayan Singh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Satheesh, J.K.K. Nattaraja College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pooja Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Trisha Sinha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajay P. Raval, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Naeem Ahmad, Government Graduate College of Science, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eseoghene Olaifa, Covenant University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajay P. Raval, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naeem Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Khadiga Mohamed Abu-Zied, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Aabsheen Saba Khanam, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Agra College, India.

(2) Swathi Putta, Andhra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhagyalakshmi M, Tumkur University, India.

(2) DH. Geetha, Vellalar College for Women (Autonomous), India.

(3) Mukti Anilkumar Jadav, Gandhinagar Institute of Pharmacy, Gandhinagar University, India.

(4) Sonam Kukloria, Gry Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Suman, Om Sterling Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) A.Maajitha Begam, Hajee Karutha Rowther Howdia College, India.

(2) Moussa Abolhassni, Cognitive and Behavioral Research Center, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aabsheen Saba Khanam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swathi Putta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Parineeta Samant, MGM Medical College, India.

(2) Prof. Irena Malinowska, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Arshad Ali Noorani, University of Kansas, USA.

(2) Haider Mohammed Majeed, University of Baghdad, College of Nursing, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akinaw Wagari Ganati, Wallaga University, Ethiopia.

(2) Haider Mohammed Majeed, University of Baghdad, College of Nursing, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mohamed Abdrhman Adris Abdallah, University of Al-Butana, Sudan.

(2) Roshini Sathiaseelan, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arshad Ali Noorani, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haider Mohammed Majeed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani, Assistant Professor, University of Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

(2) Prof. Sinan Ince, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Thiago Victorino Claus, Franciscan University, Brazil.

(3) S. P. Indra Kumar, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, India.

(4) Hanumanth S, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College, India.

(5)  Xinxing Wu, Midway University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bushra Jasim Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Fabiano Rito Macedo, State University of Amazonas, Brazil.

(3) Kasamba Ilunga Eric, Université de Lubumbashi, DR Congo.

(4) Manju K.S, Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Foundation, India.

(5) P. Mallikarjuna Rao, Dr. YSRUHS, India.

(6) Pon Arun, King Institute of Preventive Medicine & Research, India.

(7) V L N Phani Ponnapalli, JNTU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Aurora Marques Cianciarullo, Butantan Institute, Brazil.

(2) Guoyu Huang, Baylor College of Medicine, USA.

(3) Khairul Shakir B Ab Rahman, Hospital Tuanku Fauziah, Malaysia.

(4) Vielma Guevara José Ramón, Venezuela.

(5) Virendra Singh, MLN Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thiago Victorino Claus, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. P. Indra Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hanumanth S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Xinxing Wu, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Richard Sawadogo, Research institute for health sciences, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Abderrezzeq Chebout, University of Tebessa, Algeria.

(2) Manal Hadi Ghaffoori Kanaan, Technical Institute of Suwaria, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chidiebere Arinzechukwu Maduabuchi, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Muhammed Mizher Radhi, Middle Technical University (MTU), Iraq.

(3) Zakir Hussain Malik, Silapathar Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Daniela Stoin, University of Life Sciences “King Michael I” from Timisoara, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abderrezzeq Chebout, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manal Hadi Ghaffoori Kanaan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mustafa Turkmen, Giresun University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Roghan H. B, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) A. Fahima Fathima, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) Caner, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alabi Olufemi Mobolaji, Bowen University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, ‘Gr.T.Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Mahrous Abd El-Baset Attia, Egypt.

(3) S.Vallal Kannan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roghan H. B., India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Fahima Fathima, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Caner, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA