Peer Review History: Yield of Bioactive Compounds from Guava Fruit and Leaves Using Green Extraction (Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction): A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1)Prof. Halit Demir, Yil University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Sood, SKUAST, India

(2)Owolabi Tunde Ayobami, Igbinedion University, Nigeria

(3) Sarmad Ghazi Al-Shawi, University of Basrah, Iraq

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Sood, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Owolabi Tunde Ayobami, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sarmad Ghazi Al-Shawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterisation of Eggplant (Solanum melongena) Sauerkraut Stored in Sugar-Salt Osmotic Solution

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Atif Randhawa, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Marbe Alexandra Cardona, Corporacion Universitaria Lasallista, Colombia.

(3) Thevaki Mahendran, Eastern University, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Atif Randhawa, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marbe Alexandra Cardona, Colombia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Thevaki Mahendran, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Targeted Drug Development for Breast Cancer Using Innovative Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Adjunct Professor, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand. Associate Professor, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA And University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Muslim Bin Aqeel, University of Central Punjab, Pakistan.

(2) Makwana Rajeshreebahen Pravinkumar, Sardar Patel College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Kavitha S, The Apollo University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage 8.33

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muslim Bin Aqeel, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Makwana Rajeshreebahen Pravinkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kavitha S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Diversity of Endophytic, Rhizospheric and Soil Bacteria Using a Targeted Metagenomic Approach in Mali

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sujan Banik, Assistant Professor, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Kumar, CCRAS-CARI, India

(2) Adarsh Kumar Meena, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, India

(3) Nipun Bariya, Veer Narmad South Gujarat Univeristy, Dr. A P J Abdul Kalam Govt. College, India

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunil Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adarsh Kumar Meena, India) | File 1 |NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nipun Bariya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Management of Chocolate Toxicity in a Rottweiler Dog

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Imran, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Kamal M. Alsaad, University of Basrah, College Of Veterinary Medicine, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Imran, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamal M. Alsaad, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agroforestry Systems Based on Anacardium occidentale L. (Anacardiaceae): Socio-Economic Yield and Environmental Insights from the Peripheries of Benoué National Park, Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mithilasri. M, Anna University, India.

(2) Rashmi Ramesh Shanbhag, Institute of Wood Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mithilasri. M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rashmi Ramesh Shanbhag, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Education Given According to Watson’s Theory of Human Caring on Pregnancy Distress

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, Chair Director, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Suresh Kumar Ray, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, India

(2) Birnur Yesildag, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Suşehri Health School Nursing, Turkiye

(3) Martin Awe Akilla, Bolgatanga Technical University, Ghana

(4) Malasevskaia Iana, Yemen

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suresh Kumar Ray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Birnur Yesildag, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Martin Awe Akilla, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Malasevskaia Iana, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epidemiological, Clinical and Paraclinical Aspects of the Association of Diabetes and COVID-19 in a Lome Regional Hospital, Togo

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hetal Pandya, Head, Dharamsinh Desai University, Gujarat, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Regina Rachmawati, Universitas Gunadarma, Indonesia.

(2)Namrata Makkar, India.

(3)Taner Aliç, Hitit University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Regina Rachmawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Namrata Makkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Taner Aliç, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Analysis of 4G Technology Across Mobile Network Operators in Nigeria Using Evolve Radio Access Bearer Channel Drop Rate

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, AssistantProfessor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(2) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Mateen Ahmed, Osmania University, India.

(2) Khanyisani Khayelihle Xulu, University of South Africa, South Africa.

(3) S.Uma, Government Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Mateen Ahmed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khanyisani Khayelihle Xulu, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.Uma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From ‘Sexiest Job’ to ‘Most Responsible Role’: The Evolution of Data Scientists

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. G. Sudheer, GVP College of Engineering for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Janifer Nahar, Louisiana State University, United States of America.

(2) Chirag Mavani, United States of America.

(3) Mohit Tiwari, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, India.

(4) Hirenkumar Mistry, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.88

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Janifer Nahar, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chirag Mavani, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohit Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hirenkumar Mistry, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA