Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(2) Prof. Doina Bein, California State University Fullerton, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Arvindhan, Galgotias University, India.

(2) Narayana Challa, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mengmeng Chen, The University of Electro-Communications, Japan.

(2) Shweta Kulshrestha, Institute of Applied Medicines and Research, Ghaziabad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Arvindhan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narayana Challa, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Janvier Gasana, Associate Professor, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Amanuel Admasu Yayna, Ethiopia.

(2) Abdullahi Khalid, Institute of Urology and Nephrology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mojeed Olaitan Rafiu, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Ambrose Alli University, Nigeria.

(2) Naveed Ahmed Mahar, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Gulsah Cikrikci Isik, Turkıye.

(2) Mastaneh Moghtaderi, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Shahab Masoumi, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amanuel Admasu Yayna, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdullahi Khalid, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rachid Masrour, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Pravin Latane, Sinhgad Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Swetha Rani.L, AMC Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditya Kumar Singh, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Bhagya R, RV College of Engineering, India.

(3) Indrabhan Supdu Borse, SSVPS B.S. Deore College of Engineering, India.

(4) K. S. Chakradhar, Mohan Babu University, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College, India.

(5) Mariem Abdi, Tunisia.

(6) Md Hossam-E-Haider, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Bangladesh.

(7) Rajavel V, National Institute of Technology Agartala, India.

(8) Revansiddappa, Sharnbasva University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pravin Latane, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swetha Rani.L, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil, Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Assistant Professor, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Muzamil Hussain ALHussaini, Thal University, Pakistan.

(2) Kishor S. Wagh, Marathwada Mitra Mandals I.O. Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G.Elaiyaraja, Vemu Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Paradkar Vinayak Digambar, Krishi Vidnyan Sankul, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muzamil Hussain ALHussaini, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kishor S. Wagh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Aqib Shafiq, Ghazi University, Pakistan.

(2) Hafiza Ayesha Andleeb, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Aqib Shafiq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hafiza Ayesha Andleeb, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Imane Boujguenna, Ibn Zohr University, Morocco.

(2) Tooraj Zandbaf, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Blerina Saraci Qirinxhi, University of Medicine, Tirana, UHC Mother Teresa, Albania.

(2) Carlos S Ruggeri, Buenos Aires University, Argentina.

(3) Madhuri Arora, AIIMS Bhopal, India.

(4) Majid Ansari, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(5) Sofia Xenaki, Switzerland.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bushra Jasim Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Imane Boujguenna, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tooraj Zandbaf, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wolfgang Linert, Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology, Europe.

Reviewers:

(1) Subramaniam Jahanadan, Kolej Matrikulasi Labuan, Malaysia.

(2) Jianwen Wang, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Taiwan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hema Krishna Ravuri, Vignan’s Lara Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(2) Ronald Fernando Rodriguez Espinoza, Universidad Autónoma del Perú, Perú.

(3) Syed Khalid Mustafa, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

(4) Yasir Zulfiqar, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subramaniam Jahanadan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jianwen Wang, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Kevin Fernandez, AIMST University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) P.V.G.D.N. Vihanga, Uva Wellassa University, Sri Lanka.

(2) Ahmad Saifun Naser, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mohamed Taha Zalama, Field Crops Research Institute, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P.V.G.D.N. Vihanga, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmad Saifun Naser, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Essam Fathy Mohamed El-Hashash, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Shiv Lal, Rajasthan Technical University, India.

(2) Paul Okon Udom, Federal University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aisha Isa Shehu, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Le Van Dai, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.

(2) Tarana Afrin Chandel, Integral University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shiv Lal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul Okon Udom, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy Mohy El-Din Afefy, Tanta University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogeesh N, Government First Grade College, India.

(2) Satyanaraynaa, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abimnui Norine Wendi, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon.

(2) K. D. V. Pavan Kumar Varma, Annamalai University, India.

(3) K.Kalaiarasi, Cauvery College for Women, India.

(4) Mahamat Nour Abdallah, University of N’Djamena, Chad.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Lekha A, PESU, India.

(2) Manikandan S, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogeesh N, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satyanaraynaa, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA