Peer Review History: Prospects of Solar Pump for Irrigation and Household Applications for Climate Resilience in the Coastal Region of Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Raveendra N. Gadag, India.

(2) Santosh P. Mane, Sameer Gandhi Kala Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nikhilesh Baruah, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rashid Manzoor Bhat, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Shivani Kumari, Nagaland University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raveendra N. Gadag, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Santosh P. Mane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Germination Time on the Properties of Flours from Red and Brown Varieties of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan) Seeds

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. José Luis Ramírez Ascheri, Food Engineer & Researcher, Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Catherine Mueni Peter, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

(2) Anil Pokhrel, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anamika Sharma, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Virate Kiprop, Egerton University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Anil Pokhrel, Nepal.

(2) Sumartini, Politeknik Kelautan dan Perikanan Dumai, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Catherine Mueni Peter, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil Pokhrel, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of Marine Zooplankton in the Maheshkhali Channel, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. B. Deivasigamani, Annamalai University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rana Mukherji, The ICFAI University, India.

(2) Mahender Singh, H. P. University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Olagbemide Peter Taiwo, Afe Babalola University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Zelalem Dessalegn, Adama Science and Technology University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rana Mukherji, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahender Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Parametric Evaluation of Biogas Production from Sawdust and Treated Human Faeces: Optimal Custom Design Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bojan Durin, Associate Professor, University North, Varaždin, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Kharpude S. N, College of Agricultural Engineering and Post Harvest Technology, India.

(2) Jayati Vaish, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial College of Engineering and Management, India.

(3) Deogratias Nurwaha, University of Burundi, Burundi.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bouraima Safiou, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.

(2) Punam Rani, Government College for Women, Faridabad, India.

(3) R.Sreedhar, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr.Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(4) Shubham Arun Parwate, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Anuja S. Zine, Deogiri College, India.

(2) Shyamsing Thakur, D Y Patil COE Akurdi, Pune University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kharpude S. N., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jayati Vaish, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deogratias Nurwaha, Burundi) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Patterns of Indigenous Land Tenure and Utilization: Comparison of Customary Law in Balinese and Acehnese People

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Amador Cernuda-Lago, King Juan Carlos University, Spain.

(2) Orlando Reynoso Orozco, Universidad de Guadalajara, Mexico.

(3) Constance Chifamba, Solusi University, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rafia Rahman, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Nirmal Kumar Betchoo, Université des Mascareignes, Mauritius.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amador Cernuda-Lago, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Orlando Reynoso Orozco, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Constance Chifamba, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Variability for Herbage Yield and Its Component Traits in Genotypes of Kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata) (Burm. f.) Wall. ex Nees

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Askar Ghanbari Odivi, Sharekord University, Iran.

(2) Emel Ozer, Konya Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Institute, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aruna Mehta, College of Horticulture and Forestry,Thunag, India.

(2) Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Polytechnic University of Ecuador, Ecuador.

(3) Kou Hayakawa, Japan.

(4) Suchit Kumar, Bihar Veterinary College, BASU, India.

(5) Víctor Manuel de Jesús Canché Ek, México.

(6) Vikas K Guleria, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Avtar Singh Bimbraw, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Justin R Nayagam, Union Christian College, Aluva, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Askar Ghanbari Odivi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emel Ozer, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Economic Analysis of Cropping Pattern, Marketing Chains and Food Security Status of Farm Households in Rural-Urban Interface of Bengaluru, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Triyanti, University of Indonesia, Indonesia.

(2) Woradee Jongadsayakul, Kasetsart University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adewuyi Adekunle Kolawole, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) İsmail Ukav, Adiyaman University, Turkey.

(3) Jajnaseni Rout, Ravenshaw University, India.

(5) Lavakush Singh, Saibalaji International Institute of Management Sciences, India.

(6) Prabowo Tjitropranoto, IPB University, Indonesia.

(7) S.Praveenkumar, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bilal Ahmad Bhat, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.

(2) Diganta Kumar Das, Lakhimpur Commerce College, Dibrugarh University, India.

(3) Preeya P Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

(4) R N Mishra, Mizoram University, India.

(5) Sajad A. Saraf, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST-K), India.

(6) Tariq H.Y. Al-Maliky, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Triyanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Woradee Jongadsayakul, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unveiling the Impact of Mythimna seperata Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Agriculture: Insights into Host Range Biology and Biological Control: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Peter A. Roussos, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece.

(2) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Kalaivanan, Arignar Anna Govt. Arts College University, India.

(2) Jitendra Singh, Bihar Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kumari Manimuthu Veeral, India.

(2) Mihai- Iacob Bențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (USAMVCN), Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Kalaivanan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jitendra Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nanotech for Fertilizers and Nutrients-Improving Nutrient use Efficiency with Nano-Enabled Fertilizers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mirjana Bulatovic-Danilovich, Associate Professor, West Virginia University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Khin Khin Mu, Myanmar.

(2) Haider Ali Kareem, Maysan University, College of Agriculture, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maged Mohammed Ba Suliman, Hadramout University, Yemen.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khin Khin Mu, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haider Ali Kareem, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sarcasm Detection in Pidgin Tweets Using Machine Learning Techniques

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Omkar Pattnaik, Associate Professor, Sandip University, Nashik, India.

(2) Dr. Sherin Zafar, Assistant Professor, School of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Jamia Hamdard University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka, University Institute of Computing, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) Ramesh Chundi, Reva University, India.

(3) N. Nirmalajyothi, VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(4) Madhura Prabha R, Stella Maris College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyanka, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramesh Chundi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N. Nirmalajyothi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Madhura Prabha R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA