Peer Review History: The Sero-prevalence and Risk Factors of Chlamydiosis among Women of Reproductive Age in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Njunda Anna Longdoh, University of Buea, Cameroon.

(2) Uma Gupta, ELMCH, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) María Elizabeth Márquez Contreras, University of the Andes, Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Njunda Anna Longdoh, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Uma Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Disabled Sports and Branches in Turkey

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Vaishali A. Kherdekar, MIT Arts Commerce and Science College, India.

(2) Ekta, CCRAS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hojjatollah Siavoshy, University College of Omran Toseeh, Farhangian University, Bu-Ali Sina University, Nahavand University, Iran.

(2) P. N. Palanisamy, Mahendra College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ana Paula Rodrigues Carvalho Coutinho Almeida, Hospital Das Forças Armadas Polo Porto, Portugal.

(2) Andriani Paulin Nalle, Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia.

(3) Pat. Ola Oyeniyi, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vaishali A. Kherdekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ekta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Randomized, Single Blind, Standard Controlled, Equivalence Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of Eladi Kasaya Versus Tranexamic Acid Tablet in the Management of Asrigdara (Heavy Menstrual Bleeding): A Clinical Trial Protocol

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rafik Karaman, Distinguished Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

(2) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Linda Varghese, Amala College of Nursing, India.

(2) Johnbosco Mamah, Alex-Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

(3) Rana Choudhary, Wockhardt Hospital, India.

(4) Usha, JSS Ayurveda Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anubha Chandla, Regional Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

(2) Husnul Khotimah, Universitas Faletehan, Indonesia.

(3) Nijan Upadhyay,  Nepal.

(4) Shilpa Yerme, S.G.R.Ayurved College, India.

(5) Sidram Guled, Government Ayurveda Medical College, Mysore, India.

(6) Sunny Dhiman, Chandigarh College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Gopal M Jadhav, MUHS Nashik, India.

(2) Gourish Asuti, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Bangalore, India.

(3) KM Sweta, RGUHS, India.

(5) Nataliya Kitsera, Lviv Oncology Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ukraine.

(6) Parul, BPS GMC (W), Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.

(7) Patil Dhanashri, SDMCA, India.

(8) Pramodini J. Patil, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(9) Roopa K P, Sapthagiri College of Engineerig, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Linda Varghese, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Johnbosco Mamah, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rana Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Usha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Renoprotective Effects of Liraglutide and Alfacalcidol against Cisplatin Induced Nephrotoxicity in Mice

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan Ince, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lisbet Brandi, North Zealand University Hospital, Denmark.

(2) Walid Ossama Abdelfattah Atta, Assiut University, Egypt.

(3) Krishnaraju Venkatesan, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lisbet Brandi, Denmark) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Walid Ossama Abdelfattah Atta, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Krishnaraju Venkatesan, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of War on Mental Health in Cameroon’s North-west and South-west Regions: A Psycho-traumatology Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manabu Makinodan, Nara Medical University, Japan.

(2) Dr. Pasquale Striano, University of Genoa, G. Gaslini Institute, Genova, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Sajid Husain Kazmi, Amity University, India.

(2) Jag Mohan Prajapati, Madhya Pradesh Medical Science  University, India.

(3) Elias Ezo, Wachemo University, Ethiopia.

(4) Divyani Soni, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(5) Manoj Tiwari, Mansarovar Dental College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bemina Ja, Ragiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Soma Lahiri Mallik, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) G. Kiran Kumar Reddy, Rajeev Gandhi Memorial College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syed Sajid Husain Kazmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jag Mohan Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Elias Ezo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Divyani Soni, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Manoj Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Tracing the Cultural Origin of Chinese Identity Based on Ancient Chinese Myths: A Mythological Approach and Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Svetlana Valentinovna Gerasimova, The Kosygin State University of Russia, Moscow Politechnical University, Russia.

(2) Kebede Lemu Bekelcha, Bule Hora University, Ethiopia.

(3) Swirly, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mubarak ali Ahmed Alhammadi Alyadoumi, Queen Arwa University, Yemen.

(2) Muhammad Adeel Kamran, Ghazi University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Svetlana Valentinovna Gerasimova, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kebede Lemu Bekelcha, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Swirly, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Computational Approach on Fenofibrate Drug Using Degree-Based Topological Indices and M-polynomials

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Aqsa Sattar, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Muhammad Saqlain Zakir, CMSATS University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Rosalio Reyes, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aqsa Sattar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Saqlain Zakir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: On the Substrate Specificity and Some Properties of the Extracellular Oxidase from the Neonothopanus nambi Basidiomycete

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Former Professor, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tamalika Paul, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, India.

(2) N. Prabhu, Vivekanandha College of Engineering for Women, India.

(3) Devipriya Rabin Majumder, Abeda Inamdar Senior College of Atrs Science and Commerce, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lata Kumari, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Madhuri Dipak Pawar, Shivaji University, India.

(3) Ramalingappa, Davangere University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tamalika Paul, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Prabhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Devipriya Rabin Majumder, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth and Yields Performance Evaluation of Maize Raised on Termite Mound and Surrounding Soils

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Srikanth Mandela, Srkr Engineering College, India.

(2) Jomsen Jini, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayalew Muluye, Begimeder College of Teachers Education, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) M.S.Rawat, Uttarakhand State Council for Science & Technology (UCOST), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Srikanth Mandela, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jomsen Jini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Proving Maximal Linear Loose Tangle as a Linear Tangle

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematics and Physics, Bohai University, Jinzhou, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Angelo Monfroglio, Politecnico Milano, Italy

(2) Benard Gisilanbe Vetbuje, Akdeniz Karpaz Universitesi, Cyprus.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sonia Kaur Bansal, Poornima Group (Poornima Institute of Engineering and Technology), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Angelo Monfroglio, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Benard Gisilanbe Vetbuje, Cyprus) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA