Peer Review History: A Review on Propelling Agricultural Practices with Biotechnology into a New Era

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernandez, Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.

(2) Prof. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj S H, ICAR-IARI, India.

(2) Iwan Muhamad Ramdan, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manoj S H, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iwan Muhamad Ramdan, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bauhinia thonningii Schumach & Thonn (Fabaceae): Phytochemical Screening and Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Barks

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

(2) Prof. Francisco Marquez-Linares, School of Science and Technology, Universidad Ana G. Méndez-Gurabo Campus, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Seema Venkatrao Pattewar, DBATU, Suryadatta College of Pharmacy, Healthcare and Research, India.

(2) Vinod Kumar Gauttam, Shiva Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Singh, College of Agriculture Sciences, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(2) Sidra Farooq, Abasyn University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) J.Johncy Caroline, Bharathiar University, India.

(2) Suman, Om Sterling Global University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seema Venkatrao Pattewar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinod Kumar Gauttam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Seed Production Techniques for Flowering Annuals: A Comprehensive Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Indrasena Reddy, Bvrith College of Engineering for Women, India.

(2) K. Malarkodi, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Indrasena Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Malarkodi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Attitudes of Indian and Saudi Students in Learning English as a Second Language (ESL)/English as a Foreign Language (EFL): A SWOT Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr Mohamad Fadhili bin Yahaya, Associate Professor, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Husam Mohammed Kareem Al-Khazaali, Imam Al-Kadhum College, Iraq.

(2) Ana Claudia Tenor, UNIBR College, Brazil.

(3) Gentjana Taraj, Aleksander Moisiu’ University, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akihito Kikuchi, Japan.

(2) Gulzhaina K. Kassymova, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Kazakhstan.

(3) Jeyaraj John Sekar, The American Collage, India.

(4) Leivas Marcela, UNCPBA, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Venkat Lakshmi H, Smt. VHD. Central Institute of Home Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Husam Mohammed Kareem Al-Khazaali, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ana Claudia Tenor, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gentjana Taraj, Albania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence and Infestation Pattern of Sunflower Head Borer (Helicoverpa armigera) and Leaf Eating Caterpillar (Spodoptera litura) under the Influence of Climatic Factors

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Bashir Barau, Federal College of Agricultural Produce Technology, Nigeria.

(2) John G Vlachogiannis, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hafiza Ayesha Andleeb, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bashir Barau, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John G Vlachogiannis, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synergizing Geophysical Analysis and Geotechnical for Artificial Recharge Well and Aquifer Studies: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lei Zhang, Winston Salem State University, USA.

(2) Prof. Abbas Mohammed, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden.

Reviewers:

(1) Paraskevas Charalampos, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

(2) Oluwadamilare Oluwadamilare Odugbesan, University of Haifa, Israel.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shein Evgeny, Moscow State University, Russia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hafiz Mohammed Nazifi, University of Potsdam, Germany.

(2) Sabbar Abdullah Saleh, University of Tikrit, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paraskevas Charalampos, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oluwadamilare Oluwadamilare Odugbesan, Israel) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Impact of Calcination Temperatures on Kola Nut Pod Residue as Catalyst for Biodiesel Synthesis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Aydogan, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Andrea Sandra Chrisitine D Cruz, India.

(2) Keshamma E, Maharani’s Science College for Women, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Md. Golam Sazid, Nano Research Center, Bangladesh.

(2) Yengkokpam Robinson, Kamakhya Pemton College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Siham Lhimr, University Mohammed V, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Andrea Sandra Chrisitine D Cruz, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Laboratory Bioassays to Study the Efficacy of Diamides against Leucinodes orbonalis (Guenee) of Brinjal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kamal Kant, Assistant Professor, Aspee Shakilam Biotechnology Institute, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Selvamurugan, Bharathidasan University, India.

(2) Nahid Sultana, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Selvamurugan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nahid Sultana, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Suppression of Sugarcane Red Rot Disease through Its Rhizospheric Mycoflora

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ana Cruz Morillo Coronado, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Colombia.

(2) Hussein Mahmood Shukri, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Antônio Francisco de Sousa, Brazil.

(2) Ma. Dolores Castañeda Antonio, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico.

(3) Radoslaw Walkowiak, Poland.

(4) Taghreed El sayed Eissa, Egypt.

(5) Ujjal Kumar Pati, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Hussein Ali Salim, Iraq.

(2) Kamal Prasad, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ana Cruz Morillo Coronado, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hussein Mahmood Shukri, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA