Peer Review History: Prevalence, Attitudes and Smoking Habits among Healthcare Professionals in Southwest Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Stan Florin Gheorghe, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Hammad, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Pakistan.

(2) Grasiele Fatima Busnello, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Deepak Kumar, Uma Nath Singh Autonomous State Medical College, Jaunpur, India.

(2) Pritha Sarkar, India.

(3) Shivangi Mudgal, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Hammad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Grasiele Fatima Busnello, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Assessment of Hepatoprotective Activity of Catharanthus roseus on CCL4 Induced Rat Model with Safety Profile Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Adjunct Associate Professor, Muthayammal Centre for Advanced Research (MCAR), Muthayammal College of Arts and Science, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Farinaz Vafadar Esfahani, Iran.

(2) Lekha Mathew, Westfort College of Pharmacy, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

(3) Ali Abdullahi Damasak, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mir Ajaz Akram, Govt College, Khajrana Indore, India.

(2) Pawan Arun Kulkarni, Rama Meical College Hospital and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1)  Srikala Kamireddy, Nirmala College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Farinaz Vafadar Esfahani, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lekha Mathew, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ali Abdullahi Damasak, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Berberis vulgaris Phytochemicals for Targeting PIM1 Kinase in Prostate Cancer: An In silico Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Budhi Ida Bagus, Senior Lecturer, Dr. Moewardi General Teaching Hospital, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Vincent Musungu, Uzima University, Kenya.

(2) Rameshbabu Janga, Chebrolu Hanumaiah Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(3) Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Mohstansaryah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Nataliya Kitsera, Lviv Oncology Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vincent Musungu, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rameshbabu Janga, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Examining the Moderating Effect of Board Independence on Ownership Structure and Corporate Risk: A Case Study of Nairobi Securities Exchange

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aastha Khera, Kurukshetra University, India.

(2) Siwapong Dheera-Aumpon, Kasetsart University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kwami H Quao, Wenzhou-Kean University, China.

(2) Rashesh Vaidya, Nepal Open University, Nepal.

(3) Tanushree Gupta, GLA University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ag Kaifah Riyard Bin Kiflee, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS), Malaysia.

(2) Ertan Gündüz, Istanbul Gelisim University, Türkiye.

(3) Syed M. Waqar Azeem Naqvi, Canada.

(4) Zdzisław W. Puślecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aastha Khera, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Siwapong Dheera-Aumpon, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Zinc Dynamics and Yield Sustainability in Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) under Various Zinc Application Frequencies on Typic Haplusterts

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor and Hod, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Deva Ram Meghawal, MPUAT, India.

(2) Naeem Akhtar, Institute of Soil Chemistry and Environmental Science, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Fadeyi Olasupo James, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deva Ram Meghawal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naeem Akhtar, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Abiotic Stress Responses in Woody Plants: Morphological, Physiological, and Anatomical Features

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pierre A. Raoufou Radji, Université du Lomé, Togo.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudirman, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia.

(2) M. R. Sudhakaran, Sri Paraamakalyani College, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Krishnaveni Iyengar, L.A.D. College for Women, R.T.M. Nagpur University, India.

(2) Linthoingambi Ningombam, Central Agricultural University, College of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(3) Shouhartha Choudhury, Assam University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Mangal Suresh Tathe, MUHS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudirman, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. R. Sudhakaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Different Organics’ Efficacy on Seed-Borne Pathogen Colletotrichum spp. of Chilli

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sławomir Borek, Associate Professor, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Salma Tissaoui, National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, Carthage University, Tunisia.

(2) C L Mourya, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salma Tissaoui, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C L Mourya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: HIV Risk Perception and Assessment among Youths in Rivers State, Nigeria: A Comparative Cross-sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kailash Gupta (Retd.), NIAID, NIH, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Pranay Punj Pankaj, Nagaland University, India.

(2) F. Mohsenzadeh Ledari, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Adraa Hussein Shawq, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Billy Odhiambo Ochieng, Rongo University, Kenya.

(3) K N Prasad, The Tamil Nadu Dr M G R Medical University, India.

(4) Masime Francess, Kenya.

(5) Yuliani Winarti, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pranay Punj Pankaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (F. Mohsenzadeh Ledari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Causal Relationship between Government Expenditure and Inflation in Nigeria: Smooth Transition Regression Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Imdad Ullah, Ghazi University, Pakistan.

(2) Tilahun Nigatu Habtemariyam, Dilla University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Esmaiel Abounoori, Semnan University, Iran.

(2) Kalana Nuwanpriya Alupotha, The Open University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Imdad Ullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tilahun Nigatu Habtemariyam, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Advanced Radiology Techniques: A Review of Their Role in Elderly Females with Breast Cancer

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ravi Kumar Chittoria, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Neha Sameer Shahare, SPP University, India.

(2) N. Komal Kumar, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anamika Rangra, Himachal Pradesh Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Kumaraswamy Barla, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neha Sameer Shahare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Komal Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA