Peer Review History: A Study of Acreage Dynamics and Crop Variability in the Horticultural Sector of ODOP Scheme of Madhya Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Hj. Mustafa Bin Dakian, Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia.

(2) Rupesh Rastogi, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Arashk Masaeli, Research Institute Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Iran.

(2) Mohd Fazli Mohd Sam, Univeristi Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.

(3) Tran Huu Ai, Van Hien University, Vietnam.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hj. Mustafa Bin Dakian, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rupesh Rastogi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Economic and Social Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Small-Scale Sunflower Oil Production Companies in Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

(2) Dr. Ridzwan Che Rus, Associate Professor, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia.

(3) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jolly Sushma, India.

(2) Hojjatallah Salari, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Pascalau Raul, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania.

(2) Pradipta Kumar Sahoo, N.C. Autonomous College, Utkal University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jolly Sushma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hojjatallah Salari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Overview of the Application of Magnetic Nanoparticles in the Petroleum Sector

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vivek Korde, K J College of Engineering and Management Research, SPPU University, India.

(2) M. Meena, S. T. Hindu College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Dinesh Karthik, Shanmuga Industries Arts and Science College, Thiruvalluvar University, India.

(2) Al Mawla Karrar Saad Kadhim, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Dhanraj Sudam Shirsath, SVS’s Rani Maa Saheb Rawal Mahila Science College, India.

(4) Goutam Mandal, Bankura Zilla Saradamani Mahila Mahavidyapith, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Chis Timur, Oil and Gas University, Romania.

(2) Debanjali Barman Roy, Ajeenkya DY Patil University, India.

(3) Mustafa Raad Fahad, Petroleum Research and Development Center PRDC, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vivek Korde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Meena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Thermally Extracted Carrot Oil Using Biomass Solvent to Boost Consumer Goods: Box-Behnken Design Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Siddique, BUITEMS, Pakistan.

(2) Bikila Gebeyehu Eticha, Wollega University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Siddique, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bikila Gebeyehu Eticha, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Thyristor-based Rechargeable Battery Charger

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, Assistant Professor, School of Electrical and Communication Sciences, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Aaron Don M. Africa, De La Salle University, Philippines.

(2) Ashwani Kumar, Hindu College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohd. Tareq Siddiqui, PES College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) A.Mohamed Ibrahim, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) G.Saravanan, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aaron Don M. Africa, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashwani Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epidemiological Trends, Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Ovarian Germ Cell Tumours at a Tertiary Hospital in Port Harcourt, Southern Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zagazig University, Egypt and Zarqa University, Jordan.

Reviewers:

(1) Santhosha, Sri Devraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, India.

(2) Javeria Saleem, Nowshera Medical College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Santhosha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Javeria Saleem, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Short Term Effect of Vermicompost on Soil Chemical Properties under Maize (Zea mays L.) Field in Northern Ethiopia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Umesh Barikara, Assistant Professor & Extension Leader, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, National University of Jaen, Peru.

(2) P Soman, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Maria Helena de Aguiar Pereira e Pestana, ISCTE-iul. Lisbon University, Portugal.

(3) Shraddha Karcho, JNKVV, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Maria Cristina de Souza, Federal University of Acre, Brazil.

(2) S.Suresh, Sona College of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manuel Emilio Milla Pino, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P Soman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nootropic Property of Punica grantum Extract as BDNF4 Stimulant for Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manabu Makinodan, Nara Medical University, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rima Benatoui, University of Annaba, Algeria.

(2) Tejeshwari  B V, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Rajarajeswari College of Nursing, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Iwan Muhamad Ramdan, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(2) Sina Dindarian, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Irene Scagnol, Italy.

(2) Pronab Ganguly, Australia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rima Benatoui, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tejeshwari B V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Study of the Antifungal Activity of Fresh and Dried Solanum anguivi Fruits on Candida albicans and Trichophyton rubrum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniela Rigano, University Federico II of Naples, Italy.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ogunrinola Olabisi Olufunmilayo, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

(2) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Mateen Tahir, Northeast Normal University, China.

(2) Sabira Sultana, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bidhan Chandra Samanta, Mugberia Gangadhar Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Katayoun Haryalchi, Guilan University of Medical Science, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ogunrinola Olabisi Olufunmilayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhananjay Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Standardization of Gandhaga Thailam: A Traditional Siddha Formulation for Skin Disorders

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martinez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

(2) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Adjunct Professor, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Gomaa Sulaiman, Medical Technology College, University of Tripoli, Libya.

(2) N. Supraja, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(3) Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, University of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

(4) K S Prasanna, KVASU, India.

(5) Rodrigo Ferreira de Sousa, Faculdade Vale do Pajeú, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aqeel Abbas Noaman, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Hemant Sarin, USA.

(3) K. R. Lanjewar, M. Z. Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ouedraogo Salfo, Health Sciences Research Institute, Burkina Faso.

(2) Zena M. Qaragholi, University of Baghdad- College of Pharmacy, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gomaa Sulaiman, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Supraja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (K S Prasanna, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Rodrigo Ferreira de Sousa, Brasil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA