Peer Review History: A Study to Assess Occupational Stress among the Farmers of Mahbubnagar District of Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shahid Naseem, Adjunct Professor, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Trivedi, Brunei.

(2) Aderibigbe Foluso, Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashish Trivedi, Brunei) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aderibigbe Foluso, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Risk Communication Effectiveness and Earthquake Preparedness of Students at the University of Mindanao, Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Subhajit Pal, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, India.

(2) Andrew Muruka, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Putu Eka Suarmika, Abdurachman Saleh University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subhajit Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Andrew Muruka, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Financial Implications of Primary Caesarean Section among Primigravida and Multiparous Women in a Tertiary Health Facility in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Petca Aida, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Martha Orendu Oche Attah, Cyprus International University, Cyprus.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Maryani Setyowati, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Indonesia.

(2) Uma Kole, Kaher Institute of Nursing Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Petca Aida, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Martha Orendu Oche Attah, Cyprus) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Impact of Drug Education Programs on Generation Z Tertiary Students’ Knowledge

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mahima Rai, Associate Professor, School of Management, IIS (deemed to be University), India.

(2) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jovana Lj. Cvetkovic, Univeritet U Pristini, Serbia.

(2) Deepak Upadhyaya, Tripura University, India.

(3) P. R. Waratenne, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

(4) Hooman Sharifi, Tobacco Prevention and Control Research Centre, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jovana Lj. Cvetkovic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepak Upadhyaya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. R. Waratenne, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hooman Sharifi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Uncertainty Quantification of the Buckley Leverett Equation with Random Oil Viscosity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rachana Pathak, Assistant Professor, University of Lucknow, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Narayan Sharma, Amity Institute of Defence Technology, Amity University, India.

(2) Naman Jain, Siemens Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atal Bihari Harichandan, Biju Patnaik University of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ehsan Fadaei-Kermani, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narayan Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naman Jain, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Remote Work Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Health in Lagos, Nigeria: A Cross-sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leandro A. Pasa, Campus Medianeira da Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Joseph Asuquo, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(2) P V Soumya, Central University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph Asuquo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P V Soumya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation, Flowering Behavior Physico-chemical and Keeping Quality of Custard Apple: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Khaulood A. Hemida, Fayoum University, Egypt.

(2) Taleb Rateb Abu Zahra, Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan.

(3) Bello Olunike Adedoyin, Osun State College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Sami Jan, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khaulood A. Hemida, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Taleb Rateb Abu Zahra, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bello Olunike Adedoyin, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effects of Structural Transformation of the Indian Economy on the Land Use Pattern

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yu Huan, College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Fekadie Bazie Enyew, Kabri Dahar University, Ethiopia.

(2) Taufiq Kurniawan, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Benny Djaja, Universtias Tarumanagara, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fekadie Bazie Enyew, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Taufiq Kurniawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Understanding the Knowledge Level of Farmers towards Climate Smart Agricultural Technologies in Agro-climatic Zones of Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

(2) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Cheppy Wati, Indonesia.

(2) Duddumpudi Venkata Sri Akshay, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zeamanuel Anteneh Yigzaw, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cheppy Wati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Duddumpudi Venkata Sri Akshay, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Climate and Weeds on the Establishment of Thyme-Based Living Mulch Systems in Drylands of Cyprus

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Hegedus Cristina, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, România.

(2) Arbaoui, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hegedus Cristina, România) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arbaoui, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA