Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: An Analysis of Farmer Awareness for Banana Production from a Technological and Geographic Perspective in Indapur Tahsil of Pune District, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Agriculture, Natural Resource Management, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Naushad Ansari, RPCAU, India.

(2) John Atsu Agbolosoo, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) University, Indonesia.

(3) Jayantkumar Vijay Rane, The RashtrasantTukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Naushad Ansari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Atsu Agbolosoo, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jayantkumar Vijay Rane, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Comparing Traversal Strategies: Depth-first Search vs. Breadth-first Search in Complex Networks

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, AssistantProfessor,
Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Sindhu, Godavari Global University, India.

(2) Angshu Kumar Sinha, NSHM Knowledge Campus Durgapur, India.

(3) S Usha Manjari, Mansarovar Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Sindhu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angshu Kumar Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S Usha Manjari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Directorial Culture and Reforming Power of Public Elementary School Teachers

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nasser Mustapha, Senior Lecturer, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.

(2) Dr. Meryem Altun Ekiz, Associate Professor, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Chanda Chansa Thelma, Chreso University, Zambia.

(2) Marlon Villaver Jr., Jefferson Union High School, United States.

(3) Gideon Abayomi Oloyede, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chanda Chansa Thelma, Zambia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marlon Villaver Jr., United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gideon Abayomi Oloyede, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Management Practices at Poultry Demonstration Centres for Boosting Backyard Poultry Farming System in Ramban District of Jammu & Kashmir, India: A Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, School of Bio-Engineering, Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S. K. Mondal, ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, India

(2) Prabal Pratap Singh, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidayalaya, India

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. K. Mondal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prabal  Pratap Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA