Peer Review History: Improvement in Vase Life of Gladiolus Cut Flowers Using Different Holding Solutions of Sodium Nitroprusside and of Salicylic Acid

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dwi Susanto, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(2) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahayu Woro Lestari, Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia.

(2) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Abdel Monnem Kahlel, Technical Agricultural College Northern Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Daniela Stoin, University of Life Sciences “King Michael I” from Timisoara, Romania.

(3) Prince Emmanuel Norman, Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute (SLARI), Sierra Leone.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dwi Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Weather Parameters on Seasonal Incidence of Oriental Armyworm, Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) Infesting Maize Ecosystem in North Kashmir

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Fransiska Nuning Kusmawati, University Prof DR Moestopo, Indonesia.

(2) Huda Al Tamimi, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gaurang S Patkar, Don Bosco College of Engineering, India.

(2) Gusti Ayu Mayani Kristina Dewi, Udayana University, Indonesia.

(3) Mohammad Ali  Alallan, Syrian Arab Republic.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fransiska Nuning Kusmawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huda Al Tamimi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Efficacy of Pyraclostrobin 10% + Thifluzamide 10% SC against Blast and Sheath Blight Diseases of Paddy Crop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Edward Ching-Ruey, Luo, Associate Professor, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bilal Ibrahim Dan-Iya, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) John Kameri Ochoko, Kampala International University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bilal Ibrahim Dan-Iya, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Kameri Ochoko, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yield Predication by DSSAT Model of Wheat Crop: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Waswa Stanlous Juma, Kibabii University, Kenya.

(2) Mohd Harun, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waswa Stanlous Juma, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd Harun, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Growth, Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) in Bundelkhand

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Koleayo Omoyajowo, USA.

(2) Nora Chaouqi, FSTS, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Beby Karina Fawzeea Sembiring, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Koleayo Omoyajowo, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nora Chaouqi, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marketing Behaviour of Young Chrysanthemum Growers in Salem District of Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Abera Teshome Aleli, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Fachrurazi, Pontianak State Institute of Islamic Studies, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Georgios Tsekouropoulos, International Hellenic University, Greece.

(2) Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, CHF, Central Agricultural University, India.

(3) Manoj Kumar Das, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abera Teshome Aleli, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fachrurazi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formation of Male Sex Tilapia Larvae (Oreochromis niloticus) Using Natural Methyltestosterone Hormone

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, School of Bio-Engineering, Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tijoy Lowore, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Malawi.

(2) Yahaya Tajudeen, Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ravindragouda Patil, KVAFSU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Haeruddin, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

(2) Mbaye Tine, Gaston Berger University, Senegal.

(3) Musingi B. M, Egerton University, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tijoy Lowore, Malawi) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yahaya Tajudeen, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effectiveness of Local Potential-Based Learning Modules on Creative and Entrepreneurial Project Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E. Seda Koç, Associate Professor, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Suman Kumar, School of Business, SR University, India.

(2) Zahra Nejatifar, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lingam Sampath, Balaji Institute of Management Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) C P Rashmi, Presidency University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Suman Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zahra Nejatifar, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Zero Trust Architecture in Cloud Networks: Application, Challenges and Future Opportunities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, Associated Professor, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Robiah Binti Yusof, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Jose Ramon Coz Fernández, University Complutense of Madrid, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Robiah Binti Yusof, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jose Ramon Coz Fernández, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reimagining Teacher Preparation: Digital Literacy in the Post-Pandemic Era

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Suo Yan Ju, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Johnstone B. Musungu, Moi University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vaibhavi Gawarikar, Navrachana University, India.

(2) R. Selvaganapathy, Indra Ganesan College of Education, India.

(3) Shehrevar Davierwala, Gandhinagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suo Yan Ju, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Johnstone B. Musungu, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA