Peer Review History: Weed Management in Soybean through Post Emergent Herbicides

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sviatoslav Pavlyshyn, Uman National University of Horticulture, Ukraine.

(2) Bambang Surya Adji Syahputra, Panca Budi University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gustavo Bich, National Univeristy of Misiones, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sviatoslav Pavlyshyn, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bambang Surya Adji Syahputra, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable Commercial Sod Production of Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda Grass) in Ghana: Assessing Growth, Visual, and Physical Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed, Al-Naggar Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) R Lokeshvar, Saveetha College of Pharmacy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

(2) Abanda Well Victorien Bienvenu, University of Padova, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Olha Shapoval, Kharkiv National Medical University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R Lokeshvar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abanda Well Victorien Bienvenu, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chemical and Sensory Properties of Biscuits Produced from wheat, Soybean and Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Wahid Bakhsh, Government Atta Shad College, Pakistan.

(2) R. Maniarasu, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aamena Zaidi, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University, India.

(2) Behzad Mohammadi, Urmia University, Iran.

(3) Hassan Sabbaghi, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wahid Bakhsh, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Maniarasu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antioxidant Properties and Effects on Nitric Oxide Release of Ethanolic Extracts of Some Selected Cameroonian Medicinal Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Somdet Srichairatanakool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Ombouma Joanna Grace Génia, Université des Sciences de la Santé, Gabon.

(2) Kamaluddeen Nura, Umaru Musa Yaradua University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Omagha Rachel, Federal School of Medical Laboratory Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Salam Himika Devi, Manipur University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ombouma Joanna Grace Génia, Gabon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamaluddeen Nura, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Neuroprotective Effects of Atorvastatin and Ethanolic Fruit Extract of Fragaria ananassa on the Cerebellum of Methamphetamine- Intoxicated Adult Male Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sefi Megawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah A.R. Fachruddin, Indonesia.

(2) E. Gulceri Gulec Peker, Giresun University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdulrhman Y. Khalifa, Al Safwa University College, Iraq.

(2) Myrene Roselyn Dsouza, Mount Carmel College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sefi Megawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (E. Gulceri Gulec Peker, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationship Analysis of Phenology, Stress Tolerance, and Mean Productivity in Wilt and Cold Stressed Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Following Synthetic PGRs Application

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Manali Singh, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University, India.

(2) Akankhya Guru, Janta Vedic College, CCSU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Varsha Kumari, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ali Abdullah Ali Majrashi, Taif University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manali Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akankhya Guru, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Cataract in Dogs: Clinical Study of 22 Cases

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Bechan Sharma, University of Allahabad, India.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Maab I. AL-Farwachi, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Om Singh, IVRI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Francisco Diniz, UTAD, Portugal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maab I. AL-Farwachi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Om Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic diversity of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Vijai Ananth, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University, India.

(2) Tety Suciaty, University of Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Vijai Ananth, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tety Suciaty, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Part Optimisation using CNC Milling Techniques and Finite Element Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, Associated Professor, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustafa Rasit Turgut, Marmara University, Turkey.

(2) Ketan Anandrao Jagtap, Government Polytechnic, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Chinmaya Prasad Padhy, GITAM University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustafa Rasit Turgut, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ketan Anandrao Jagtap, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The impact of Giloy (Tinospora cordifolia) and Amla (Emblica officinalis) Herbal Feed Additives on the Morphometric Traits of Magra Lambs Raised under the Extensive Rearing System in Western Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 3801 W Temple Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768, USA.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Bhateshwar, S.K.N. Agriculture University, India.

(2) Gaurav Kumar, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hilal Tozlu Çelik, Ordu University, Türkiye.

(2) Qazi Shehriyar Sahib, India.

(3) Sarwar Mohammed Sadq, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinod Bhateshwar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gaurav Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA