Peer Review History: Exploring Millet Genetic Diversity for Improved Crop Resilience: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Syed Hafizur Rahman, Director, IQAC, JU, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Senthilkumar, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Nwodom Stan Nwodom, Ebonyi State University, Center for Crop Improvement, Nutrition and Climate Change, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. S. Sapre, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Senthilkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nwodom Stan Nwodom, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of eWOM on Trust Inclination and Information Adoption in the Sociolla Platform

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushma Tiwari, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) R. Mugesh Kannan, Syed Hameedha Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cherian Xavier, ST Joseph Engineering College Mangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Bahman Naruoei, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sushma Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Mugesh Kannan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Field Insights into the Genetic Symphony: Decoding Gene Dynamics for Enhanced Sorghum Yield (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Avtar Singh Bimbraw, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Noé Anes García, University Oviedo, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Suneeta Singh, School of Agricultural Sciences, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avtar Singh Bimbraw, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noé Anes García, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agricultural and Manufacturing Pollution: Labor Health and Technology Progress

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria-Dolores Guillamon, Associate Professor, University of Murcia, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Haritha Paul, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

(2) Tahawwar Husain, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Kumar Gupta, Indira Gandhi Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Taha M. Alkhamis, Mutah University, Jordan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haritha Paul, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tahawwar Husain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Grounding Quality Patient Care from the Experiences of Hansenites

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giou-Teng, Yiang, Head & Associate Professor, Buddhist Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Reviewers:

(1) Manu Mitra, University of Bridgeport, USA.

(2) K Chandrasekhar, NTR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nataliya G.Petrova, Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, Russia.

(2) Riri Murniati, Indonesian Defense University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manu Mitra, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K Chandrasekhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Aquifer Vulnerability and Groundwater Prospects Using Electrical Resistivity Method in Parts of Nnewi Southeastern Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nedim Özdemir, Associate Professor, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jerjera Ulu Guduru, Haramaya University, Haramaya Institute of Technology, Ethiopia.

(2) Harish Khali, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jerjera Ulu Guduru, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harish Khali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Benefits and Skills Acquired during Coronavirus (COVID-19) Quarantine Period

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Athira M S, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, India.

(2) J. Vinnarasi, The Standard Fireworks Rajaratnam College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Azizur Rahman, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Athira M S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Vinnarasi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Interference Mitigation and Power Consumption Reduction for Cell Edge users in Future Generation Networks

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anuj Kumar Goel, Chandigarh University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Sehgal, Vaish College of Engineering, India.

(2) J. Rajalakshmi, Sethu Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sobha Manakkal, Nehru College of Engineering and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Smita Prajapati, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Sehgal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Rajalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Learning Media Design Based on Local Potential Developed at Vocational School

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Blanche Ndlovu, University of the Free State, South Africa.

(2) Linnet Zimusi, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adi Apriadi Adiansha, Indonesia.

(2) Herbert Sipahutar, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Jayendira P Sankar, University of Technology Bahrain, Kingdom of Bahrain.

(2) Mariyati Mohd Nor, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.

(3) Soo Kum Yoke, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Blanche Ndlovu, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Linnet Zimusi, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Geochemical and Isotopic Constraints on the Recharge and Salinization Origin of Groundwater Aquifers in El Rina–Nihayaat, South Sinai, Egypt

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers: 

(1) Saidou Ndao, University Iba Der Thiam of Thies, Senegal.

(2) Nelson Onyebuchi Nwobi, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Ndoye Seyni, University Cheikh Anta Diop Dakar, Senegal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saidou Ndao, Senegal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nelson Onyebuchi Nwobi, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA